WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

697

The man with nothing to lose , or the man with everything to lose ?

The man with nothing to lose , or the man with everything to lose ?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Holy shit. I did not expect this caliber of answer.

Yes indeed. This needs to be stickied.

[–] 1 pt

There's more to it though: the volume of the first group matters. When enough people have nothing to lose, that's when the threatened group will seek to benefit from organization.