Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

213

Leak data, destroy infrastructure, expose wrongdoings. anything?

Is it just me, or shouldn't these people be made to fear the consequences of their actions. How many of you have it in your power to hit your employer where it hurts?

Leak data, destroy infrastructure, expose wrongdoings. anything? Is it just me, or shouldn't these people be made to fear the consequences of their actions. How many of you have it in your power to hit your employer where it hurts?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (90).
[–] • 0 pt

Yes, I've seen that before too.

This person is working out his last few years before retirement, he basically said he'll just go early if forced.

[–] • 1 pt

I know at least one engineer person who "retired" and still took the entire business from his former employer. Now, I don't know your guy, but generically I wouldn't assume.

[–] • 0 pt

He's been many things in his career, including his own businessman, but I don't think he's interested in doing more after he retires. He really wants to work on his old cars and have the grandkids over.

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah, there's definitely a correlation between employees who are willing to risk getting fired and the ones that can afford to lose their job. The ones who will cave to pressure first are the employees that don't think they can get another job, and are the most desperate.

[–] • 1 pt

No. The ones who cave first are the ones who live on debt.

If you have no debt you have freedom.

[–] • 0 pt

Can't afford it, but there's no way in hell I'm taking that shot. They can fire me first.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I am fucking certain I could get another job. The question is whether I could find another job that doesn't have the same gay requirement. Well, specifically they haven't tried to force me yet. But I've definitely thought about what would happen if they did.

The government is pushing this shit really hard. I'm pretty sure they're assuring businesses that lawsuits due to required vaccination won't get anywhere but lawsuits over injury supposedly due to non-vaccination in case they don't require it will be automatically won. Businesses know that a lot of good people don't want the jab and that a smaller but significant portion of that will quit over it. They don't want to shoot themselves in the foot, and a lot of them aren't pozzed to begin with. They're being blackmailed.

[–] • 0 pt

There's always a chance that the justice system fails completely. But it won't be long before someone gets injured after the took a vaccine because of a work mandate, and hires well funded competent legal counsel. Even the FDA has confirmed hundreds of thousands of injuries and over ten thousand deaths. And it's safe to say not all cases are reported to VAERS, and the FDA begrudgingly confirms the ones that are.

All it takes is one young healthy person that gets the jab from work and ends in the hospital a few days later with heart damage, stroke, etc. The employer would definitely be liable, and there are opportunistic lawyers put there looking for a case like this against a big employer.

Unfortunately, Congress will probably just pass a law to remove liability from employers. O think they're just waiting for the shot to be "FDA approved."