Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

896

Leak data, destroy infrastructure, expose wrongdoings. anything?

Is it just me, or shouldn't these people be made to fear the consequences of their actions. How many of you have it in your power to hit your employer where it hurts?

Leak data, destroy infrastructure, expose wrongdoings. anything? Is it just me, or shouldn't these people be made to fear the consequences of their actions. How many of you have it in your power to hit your employer where it hurts?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (90).
[–] • 0 pt

This. Or, if you're not smart enough to have a paper trail of violations to prove the cause. The first time an employee was fired under my business, I had to submit the written warning with employee signature, copy of the employee handbook the employee signed and proof that the employee continued to violate the policy after the written warning.

[–] • 0 pt

In my opinion, everyone should be able to collect unemployment, if anyone can. If a business needs to downsize, then they're still going to cut the the 10% of people they can get away with cutting, whether the low performing or just unluckily recently hired. I don't see any reason to deny it to people that "quit" or those that were fired for cause. It's all a spectrum. Just have a hard limit on how long unemployment lasts and let everyone take it to the extent they paid in. Making the businesses pay for employment is stupid as shit. Only California could think of something that retarded.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, I can agree with that. The way it works in my state, unemployment that is collected skyrockets the UI all businesses with employees have to carry, which would lower the ability for a small business to give raises and bonuses. I'd rather be able to compensate those who work what they're worth rather than pay for someone who cannot do their job.

[–] • 1 pt

In California, they don't have receipts from UI to cover their unemployment. They collect from employers and employees, while they work, but it's not sufficient. So what they do is make companies actually pay for the employees they lay off. Except instead of paying the employee the former employer pays the state and the state pays the employee. Among other things, this incentivizes employers to say that they fired people for cause so that they don't have to pay.

Apparently this happens in Europe as well, and it contributes to their terrible job market. Hiring someone makes them almost a lifetime dependent, so you have every incentive to use contractors or outsource or just do less business rather than hire. It's a welfare state overload problem.