WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

650

Like; )))Richard Spencer(((

The reasons; 1 - it elicits the long-term memory response which is drawn from regular ((())) echoes. 2 - it allows for the distinction without the necessary "globalist" "marxist" "bolshevik" etc. Which works in the exact same manner as regular ((())) echoes do.

For instance above; )))Richard Spencer((( -> we all know him likening faggotry to being a purely European state. (I can't find the tweet)

Maybe I'm overthinking this, but it's annoying when I mistakenly use normal echoes on nonjews and have to type out their jew-controlled nature.

Like; )))Richard Spencer((( The reasons; 1 - it elicits the long-term memory response which is drawn from regular ((())) echoes. 2 - it allows for the distinction without the necessary "globalist" "marxist" "bolshevik" etc. Which works in the exact same manner as regular ((())) echoes do. For instance above; )))Richard Spencer((( -> we all know him likening faggotry to being a purely European state. (I can't find the tweet) Maybe I'm overthinking this, but it's annoying when I mistakenly use normal echoes on nonjews and have to type out their jew-controlled nature.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

The double parenthesis should be reserved for shabbos goys.

[–] 0 pt

Makes sense to me

[–] 0 pt

I agree with you. Dickie Spencer and )))Tommy Robinson((( are forgotten at this point though. The Bidan* administration has many actual kikes however.

[–] 1 pt

10/10 jews in biden's admin. It's a jewish administration 100%, he's making zero decision.

[–] 0 pt

The parenthesis pointing in the wrong direction is weird to look at. Why not [[[brackets]]]?

[–] 0 pt

Too similar and the angular edges are just too abrupt looking. Plus everyone already has muscle-memory for ))) ((( keys.