Another: "Without the amplifying communication means that are the internet, radio, television, phones, or books, would a population the same size as ours have an equivalent quantity of homosexuals?
If "no, there would be fewer, perhaps zero identifiable homosexuals in the thought-experiment population" - then by some means that exists within the real population, people "become" homosexual.
Insofar as those beings don't participate in the reproduction of the species (the Darwinian notion of "success" for a species), then the existence of homosexuality is damaging to a species' (or race's) success.
I'm seeing your replies . I don't want to reply until more people have commented
(post is archived)