A false flag is an umbrella term that I believe comes from Ancient Rome, for when a government or military attacks its own people (such as from a ship with a false flag on it) then blames it on some enemy as a justification for going to war or restricting its citizens in some way.

Most of the events we have seen in our lifetime, especially in recent years, have been false flag hoaxes where no one actually dies. Ashley Babbit is probably another example of that.

It’s much easier and safer to just not go through the trouble of killing innocent people when you can just put a bullshit story on the news and say they died.

I view “false flag” as an overused phrase that half-woke people throw around because they can’t accept the fact that any terror attack or killing could be faked when they easily and obviously could. I can’t think of an example of a true false flag in my lifetime and that includes 9/11, Las Vegas, etc. 9/11 is probably the closest example because I think some people may have actually died there. But the more I look back into it the more it seems as though the towers had been long prepared for that event and almost entirely emptied out before the demolition.

I think false flag is an event that redirects the pleb attention. Sometimes mass loss, sometimes not. I’m sure the actual definition is different.

Arson attacks are common forms of false flags, no one needs to die.

It was a botch FF, the argument is it intended to get worse but actual patriots stopped them. Rather than revise their script, the establishment still pushed it as a holocaust event.