But there is no evidence of widespread election fraud! Oh wait...
But there is no evidence of *widespread* election fraud! Oh wait...
That is the line I keep hearing from the boomers.
That is the line I keep hearing from the boomers.
It's a classic example of how to use a literal truth to mislead.
It's a classic example of how to use a literal truth to mislead.
It was never claimed it was widespread, only a few corrupt, large counties in a few swing states manipulated the results enough to change the entire state. It was very targeted and very efficient fraud, like the people doing it have lots of experience.
It was never claimed it was widespread, only a few corrupt, large counties in a few swing states manipulated the results enough to change the entire state. It was very targeted and very efficient fraud, like the people doing it have lots of experience.
Yes. The qualifier 'widespread' makes the statement technically true, but totally misleading.
Yes. The qualifier 'widespread' makes the statement technically true, but totally misleading.
(post is archived)