WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

456

So let me give some context and explain the situation.

Me have a child 5 years old with an ex. There is absolutely zero chance of me getting with the ex basically think of it as me being a sperm donar and we are comparenting

My current gf of 2 years who we plan on having kids and are committed had a problem with this situation.

I had the 5 year old. I had about an hour to kill so I was going to go hang out in the back yard with my 5 year old and smoke a cigar waiting for her mom to get home then leave. I told my current gf about my plans because she thinks the ex is trying to get back with me. She says she trust me but doesn't trust her.

I said I wouldn't go over. She still is mad and she texted me this.

The fact that the thought went thru ur head and u thought it was a good enough idea to tell me about it is the problem

Her 3 friends agreed with her I shouldn't be at my ex house ever basically.

Now she will go to sea world with her ex and their kid? Is that ok?

So let me give some context and explain the situation. Me have a child 5 years old with an ex. There is absolutely zero chance of me getting with the ex basically think of it as me being a sperm donar and we are comparenting My current gf of 2 years who we plan on having kids and are committed had a problem with this situation. I had the 5 year old. I had about an hour to kill so I was going to go hang out in the back yard with my 5 year old and smoke a cigar waiting for her mom to get home then leave. I told my current gf about my plans because she thinks the ex is trying to get back with me. She says she trust me but doesn't trust her. I said I wouldn't go over. She still is mad and she texted me this. The fact that the thought went thru ur head and u thought it was a good enough idea to tell me about it is the problem Her 3 friends agreed with her I shouldn't be at my ex house ever basically. Now she will go to sea world with her ex and their kid? Is that ok?

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Gas yourself, kike

[–] -1 pt

Reality is harsh. You are wasting a good woman.

[–] 1 pt

(((Studies))) produced to discourage white people from having big families are not "a harsh reality".

[–] 0 pt

Absolute crock of shit. Waiting after 45 years old to have a kid isn't having a big family. These studies encourages people to have children early, which is ideal and adaptive. The kids are healthier, the relationships are healthier, health is better, you avoid college, etc. All great things.

But hey, the schlomo route of college then establishing your career+travel then having a kid at 36 with your "fifth" "serious partner" is just as good to have big families. "You can wait all you want bud, don't you worry about it your sperm is eternal! Don't worry gal, just freeze some eggs, that'll do the trick! You'll have great big families!!"

Who do you think fall for that shit? What is more likely to get people to have more children, telling them they can wait or telling them they should do it early?

[–] -2 pt

White women of child bearing age should be considered state assets and only bred with top tier specimens. Since one man can impregnate 50+ women per month, the national interest isn't well served by breeding with sub 99% percentile males. Key aptitudes such a mathematics, art, language, strategy, and combat should be assessed and only males near the top in a single category while scoring highly in all others should be bred with valuable state women. The remaining males also have an important role in serving the state, and that is creating and maintaining the infrastructure to support the state's children.

[–] 1 pt

"The state's children"

KeK

Anyone discouraging white people from having children deserves lead in the head, especially fuck nuts rambling about eugenics to serve the state.

How many Spartans are still around?

[–] 2 pts

$50 says that faggots version of "top male specimen" is a football nigger who can do algebra