You are right. Disliking pride doesn't mean that you like or prefer the opposite. Which I think is reasonable.
And there's another guy in that scene, who doesn't show off, who doesn't waste time and energy in futility
And if he would later show off when he has a beer with his friends, or tells his grandchildren about how he got scarface (ergo experience pride), would that lessen his achievements?
Not wasting time in futility. As in, being efficient and professional. Is that something to take pride in?
And even Scarface himself. Now, I don't know the movie so I can only speculate. Albeit the same might apply to other mobster and villains.
Him being arrogant might've killed him. But I'm assuming he was no ordinary guy. His pride might've pushed him to become infamous, someone worth watching in a movie. Someone to remember. A more interesting character.
Wouldn't that mean that there is something desirable and admirable in this "deadly sin"?
And if he would later show off when he has a beer with his friends, or tells his grandchildren about how he got scarface (ergo experience pride), would that lessen his achievements?
It would be unwise in that instance... Kind of like those retarded criminals posting videos on tubes for the world to contemplate their deeds, basically confessing their crime. It's silly.
Not wasting time in futility. As in, being efficient and professional. Is that something to take pride in?
It's not a question of pride. You stick to what's necessary, nothing more, nothing less. There are enough rooms for errors and hazard already.
The fundamental difference between good and evil, is that, unlike evil, you can stop doing good anytime you want.
And when it comes to scarface, this is also part of the story of "tony montana"/al pacino. He does evil, since pretty much the beginning of the movie, he's a criminal escaped from castro's prisons. And he makes his way top the top through drug trafficking and assassinations. But at some point, he's asked to do something that goes against his personal moral code. And from there, shit starts to go south.
It's not a question of pride. You stick to what's necessary, nothing more, nothing less.
The only necessity is basically shelter and food.
What is wrong about having an internal drive to achieve more than basic necessities?
No, I'm talking about sticking to what's necessary in order to attain a given objective, as opposed to adding any shit you can think of that is not required/necessary just because blah
(post is archived)