I wasn't bitching about your first two options but you act as though if those don't work killing is your only option. I think you are just a fucking psycho who's looking for a reason.
Keep trying to justify being a piece of shit. Maybe you will convince yourself one day. but you'll never convince me. If you actually think you're statements are reasonable, I hope you go ahead and get yourself a McAfee's neighbor award. The planet does not need your genetic code to remain in the pool.
LMAO. OK faggot.
Someone asks you to keep your dog from damaging their property.
"No I won't keep my dog from damaging your property."
Ok, if you keep letting your dog damage my property I'm going to kill it.
"Oh no you psychopath, you should spend your own money and time to keep my dog off of your property because I can't be bothered to do so. I hope you get murdered."
What a nigger.
Ad hominem is the last respite for someone who's lost an argument.
You're no better than the Chicom scum that torture and eat dogs. so I repeat: FUCK YOU!
So you lost way back up here then.
If the owners don't contain the dog, he can shoot it imo. I wouldn't kill the dog myself, but wouldn't care if he did. I'd shoot it with a non lethal air rifle.
(post is archived)