That's a tough one. Tavistock wants 1 in 10 per their matrix of power doctrine. Milgrim showed that 1 in 100 would stand up to authority. There are some relevant studies, but I'll get back to you with more precise numbers and reasoning. Let's talk apples and apples, first. The cabal still needs more evil influencers and less good influencers. Maybe you can throw out a name or two, but good influencers aren't usually famous... they are the salt of the earth in your own neighborhoods. Your screens won't show you truly good people, generally.

I'd say we're at 25% evil approximately and less than 25% good. But, definitions can skew that. Let us assume, for a moment, that you and I have a roughly similar idea of what constitutes good and what constitutes evil.

Consciously Evil? 1% would be really high. Those who actually make a deal with dark forces, knowingly, in exchange for a specific request... tiny amount of people. Technology allows them to extend their reach, but even the average asshole would not make a deal, knowingly, with a devil. These people have the desire and intellect to master some dark arts. Generally, they lust for power. This group is smart, very literate and are capable of creative thought and critical thinking.

Semi-Consciously Evil: Mostly those who are educated and sucked into via their own self righteousness or greed. They think gangsta rap is cool, thought Bernie wasn't cucked by the corporate Dems, and believe in the moving target that is global warming. Again, not as many as you'd think, but this is where the danger lies, currently. At 5ish percent, these will be the least danger in any combat scenario, but are essential for influence of the p zombies... the glue that holds them together. This group doesn't necessarily see the dark arts as good, but still want the rewards without as much of the commitment.

Semi conscious Molochites also have an upper echelon where they are aware of the occult stuff and participate to some small extent, but are not read into the mysteries. These are influenced influencers. While they might not be as educated and indoctrinated, they still hold sway with the semi conscious and p zombies. Most semi conscious don't dabble in occult arts, but this group does.

The semiconscious are literate and think of themselves as smarter, cooler and or more talented than P Zombies. They believe they are capable of critical thinking, but they aren't. They believe they have creativity, but they don't.

Unconsciously Evil: P zombies. Not the philosophical zombie, but the propaganda zombie. Propaganda zombies have no ability to question a a narrative. The goal is to have 10% semiconscious Molochites ruling over 90% p zombies, with one biotech mind to rule them all. This hierarchy is sold in different ways to different people. Some are sold communism, others capitalism... others make a deal with the devil. Theocracy, Democracy... it doesn't matter. It's all a cover story for the devils hierarchy.

There are more p zombies than ever, due to technology.

P zombies may or may not attempt dark arts, but it wouldn't matter, anyways, as they don't affect anything. The only time p zombies have power is if they are in the wavelength of their masters, where they act as capacitors for directed designs.

P zombies are usually borderline illiterate or, if they can read, only read what is put in front of them.

However, P zombies are tricked into occultism and it is best to stay away. It would be different if they didn't own a TV or a smart phone.

Percentage wise, it is difficult to differentiate from other groups that eschew evil.

Most people are normal people. Roughly half. Ergo... "normal". However, they kind of exist in a superposition of good and evil. If you are unaware that some people actually worship Moloch or Ereshkigal or are building their own God, you haven't picked a side, yet.

It is easy for the unaware to be confused with p zombies, so it is important to be helpful to this group. The others? Don't waste your time, just your bullets.

Consciously good? Being good requires a conscious effort. It's hard to be unconsciously good.

The white arts, so to speak, are erased from history and must be rebuilt. This requires people who are highly literate, creative and capable of critical thinking. The white arts bubble up naturally in good people, thus requiring constant suppression by evil people.

How many good people are there? Percentage wise? Depends on your definition. Most people are not good. I'll try to hunt down something specific, for you, but, let's start with 50% unaffiliated, 25% affiliated with evil and 25% on the spectrum of good, but relatively few committed to good at the end of the spectrum. It sounds like a bell curve, but I'd say far more people are committed to evil than good and far more people are casually affiliated with good, because social justice is actively perverted. Its just that most people want to be seen as good, so the side of the curve with good people has a lot more skewed towards the middle.

Based on my own experience in small towns, I'd say 1 in 10,000 is truly committed to good, aware of evil and is capable of tapping into skills to eliminate evil in that they are smart and capable enough to met out justice to evil doers. These people need our help.

I believe myself to be in this realm, as I've mastered numerous talents at expert level, am aware there are people committed to evil and I do something about it when I can. I feel like I make a difference in a variety of ways. Perhaps I overestimate myself, but I have lived in many circumstances that most people cannot, and have thrived. I have also put a number of evil people in the ground. I have thwarted and or exposed a number of evil plans. I have saved good people from evil people. I do know people like me, but not very many. I seek them out because I need help.

You have to work, sustained, to be good. This is why evil naturally festers, but eventually creates a critical mass that needs to be swept away. This is the cycle evil seeks to end.

Let me see if I can get you something specific and a bit more scientific.

Milgrams study, if you look past his manipulation of the data, apparently contains somewhat of an answer. He left out a few important features, the worst being that half of the participants actually knew it was staged. If we eliminate those, we have promising numbers.

In the 60s, 66% of people would do evil if ordered to do so. If we ignore the manipulation of the data, it actually turns out that 33% of people stood up to authority in order to not do evil.

Numerous replications of the experiment have occurred, almost exactly producing Milgram's results while being unaware of the manipulation. I interpret this to mean that more people are good than they want us to believe, otherwise there would be no need to manipulate the data and keep repeating fake results.

Let's say approximately 33% of people are good, for now. I wasn't expecting to find that.

This shows that a group of white boys won't have conflict unless there is an outside force interfering.

https://www.simplypsychology.org/robbers-cave.html

Difficult to determine numbers, but we are immediately posed with questions of time, place and race; in regards to good or evil.

Fatherlessness plays a role in morality and impulse control.

https://www.fatherhood.org/father-absence-statistic

It's an interesting line of questioning, in that you immediately see the world of psychology steer as far from quantifying what makes people good and bad right around the time Milgram proved you could put some of these ideas to the test.

One person can give orders in the am to dictate all the news for the world. That is what technology allows. The cabal loves this, as they believe stealing freedom and agency from other people adds to their own. They're not all that wrong.

The logical conclusion of evil is one master stealing everyone else's agency. Is this trend happening? We could study it, but nobody does so accurately and without ulterior agendas.

Would black children living at subsistence level in Africa do as well as the Robbers Cave boys? Would two Latino groups with no fathers do as well?

We're not allowed to study that, apparently. Poverty is not the reason for bad behavior. Fatherlessness might be. However, wouldn't the race baiters love to prove that once and for all? No. Fatherlessness is part of their toolset.

Of the couple of thousand studies you can find that reference morality in the title, there seems to be a directionlessness in regards to morality. Intentional, I'd say, as I only see a handful of meta studies where we'd see many more in other areas of interest... literally less than 5. Different branches of research seem to be driven by variable sets of questions and empirical approaches that do not connect to a common approach or research agenda... unless the agenda was obfuscation.

What this means is that morality was useful for maintaining social order, by the powers that be, but they no longer require it.

Empathy, a capability of dogs and monkeys, not just humans, is what leads to The Golden Rule. Humans have a magical capacity for empathy, though, where mirror neurons synchronize between multiple individuals in cyclical millivolt feedback loops.

Ultimately, psychologists are no doing a great job of quantifying moral actions and behaviors and their contributing factors. Considering what civilization is capable of, it seems strange that morality and quality of life statistics aren't at the forefront of concern. Instead, we have critical race baiting.

Instead of studying what results in better morals, the entire field is way more preoccupied with studies that explore what debilitated morality like exposure to war and being abused as a child. Not that these things shouldn't be studied, the trend shows us gaps in motivation to learn certain things about morality. People literally avoid doing studies that would force them to question their own moral reasoning combined with selection pressure on publication according to political agendas.

Emotional resiliency leads to resiliency against peer pressure. The cabal does not want anyone to be emotionally resilient.

If you read the meta studies, you'll see that no one wants to answer your question. There isn't enough of the right kind of data.

There is tons of data on how to manipulate morality, however, which, suggests to me that someone is watching the metric you are interested in, in real time.

EVL BATCAVE is the project I'll be looking into, next, because they're tied to the daemon that purportedly exists to spot evil people.

Hopefully, this will bring us to the studies we need to find where AI is being used to spot bad people with mal intent.

This technology is used to lock people out of classified computers.

Point being, there is an answer to your question that Google doesn't want everyone to know. I believe the numbers are in Flux. Let's see if we can dig up someone's attempt to quantify this.

These people will have some numbers we can work with.

https://www.faception.com/