Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

482

Just kidding. I don't wonder at all. He hasn't avoided their control. In fact I suspect the original aou was killed or gulaged shortly after the chinese army rolled down the bridge. I accuse you of being a chinese communist party operative running psyops on the american people. What say you ?

Just kidding. I don't wonder at all. He hasn't avoided their control. In fact I suspect the original aou was killed or gulaged shortly after the chinese army rolled down the bridge. I accuse you of being a chinese communist party operative running psyops on the american people. What say you @aou ?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (32).
[–] • 0 pt

Milgrams study, if you look past his manipulation of the data, apparently contains somewhat of an answer. He left out a few important features, the worst being that half of the participants actually knew it was staged. If we eliminate those, we have promising numbers.

In the 60s, 66% of people would do evil if ordered to do so. If we ignore the manipulation of the data, it actually turns out that 33% of people stood up to authority in order to not do evil.

Numerous replications of the experiment have occurred, almost exactly producing Milgram's results while being unaware of the manipulation. I interpret this to mean that more people are good than they want us to believe, otherwise there would be no need to manipulate the data and keep repeating fake results.

Let's say approximately 33% of people are good, for now. I wasn't expecting to find that.