Let me repeat myself.
I'm seeking knowledge. How would I pass any on?
I'm curious
You've now stated both sides of an argument. You claim to know and then claim to not know.
reasons other than I have stated.
I didn't realize you were the gatekeeper.
Referring back to the opening sentence. Nothing you have said follows any logic and none of it works. Less of you makes the discussion better.
It's not gatekeeping, I stated a position, and you have yet to refute it, just refute my argument. Incapable perhaps? What else makes sense as to why the drop is missing besides what I said? Being curious states nothing. I WANT to know what you are thinking, and you're deliberately deflecting.
In short: Why. Was. The. Drop. Delayed? Just answer, if you can.
I stated a position
So prove it. You bear the burden of proof. Not me. I can only guess your a religious scholar as this how they tend to try to argue. And no, your tiny brain being unable to conceive of something is not a usable metric.
Again, I repeat myself.
I want you to understand his comments, and people like him are going out because he's too stupid for proper interaction
Election already certified, that's my proof.
These things were already counted, if incorrect, why wait? What has your brain conceived that I missed as to another reason for a delay?
(post is archived)