WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

770

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

All of the piles driven into the bedrock literally rotted into dust, not only did it collapse, it collapsed into the holes left by the soft sand and destroyed pilings. When all that supports your multi metric ton structure is sand, it won't last long.

It literally sank into the earth.

[–] 0 pt

You’re way to quick to give excuses for this. Glownigger!!!!

Sure looks a lot like OKC to me in the pictures.

Not going to argue, it wasn't blown up so please stop.

It collapsed because its foundation was made of literal sand.

[–] 0 pt

It sank pretty quickly. What’s that about.

What is liquefaction? Liquefaction takes place when loosely packed, water-logged sediments at or near the ground surface lose their strength in response to strong ground shaking. Liquefaction occurring beneath buildings and other structures can cause major damage during earthquakes.

In this case, the pilings used for support literally rotted away to powder by the pictures I've seen, once the ground started shaking from the first impact, the rest of the sand liquified and brought it all down.

I'm a Californian, who learned a lot about liquifaction during the 89 quake. It applies here as well.

[–] 0 pt

Sand can't melt steel beams!

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Saltwater can, and did. Guess you've never dug a hole at the beach and watched it fill with water have you?

Stop being a bot, use your mind for something else, internet porn is rotting it.

[–] 1 pt

To add to this, inadequate waterproofing maintenance causes three major problems:

1) Saltwater corrodes rebar and i-beams, making them vulnerable to catastrophic failure.

2) Water displaces sand and doesn't really compress. This causes it to wash out the sand under the building...until the water leaves and all you have is a void.

3) Voids, aka sinkholes, lead to catastrophic collapses because the building doesn't settle gradually...it goes from "everything is fine" to pancaking into the "new basement".

[–] 2 pts

Because when similar sized multistory buildings collapse, they leave a similar sized pile of debris at the base of the collapse because of gravity.

[–] 2 pts

Why is the idf there?

[–] 0 pt

Because whenever an Israeli asset (read - intelligence gathering spy) dies it becomes imperative Israel regains said data (cell phones, lap tops, computers etc) before the actual authorities stumble onto their illegal spy practices. They did the same thing during the Christchurch earthquake of 2009 or 2011,that squashed a van belonging to 'a group of three or four Israeli backpackers' , an israeli search and rescue team was sent to 'volunteer help' but got caught sneaking them into the cordoned off central city red zone early morning the very first fcking night they arrived by armed military patrols - trying to retrieve the backpackers laptop and personal possessions. Iirc they got btfo and sent back to israel but not before managing to take the stuff with them after 'high level diplomatic talks' lol.

[–] 1 pt

Because the same foundational failure occurred, but by water instead of bomb. An explosion would have been heard.

I'll take "Buildings that were Bombed" for $500, Alex.

It's what a collapsed skyscraper looks like regardless of the cause. See progressive structural collapse.

[–] 1 pt

Kinda symbolic of multi cultural failure in a way

this one may have just collapsed due to a bad concrete mix. it was known to have structural problems and rusting rebar in the concrete

but who knows really. time will tell

[–] 1 pt

Jews bombed it to protect their pedo friends. Then came in to remove evidence

I like how you think, good sir.

[–] 1 pt

No thanks rabbi. I work alone. My blood says so.

[–] 0 pt

because the demo team used the same methodology