WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

625

Seems outrageous to me.

Seems outrageous to me.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 15 pts

Because passing down wealth to the next generation is something only responsible people are capable of... And the government does everything they can to discourage responsibility.

[–] 0 pt

Yeah. We wouldn’t want to reward foresight or anything. Also: GUMMINT GIBS

[–] 11 pts

Very simple. You inherited something and I want 1/3 and there's not a fucking thing that you can do about it!

[–] 5 pts

Because you never owned it and never will. I had something like this happen to me in Europe. Some family member died and my tax bill was 70% of the total assets because i was not a direct lineage.

[–] 0 pt

70% fucking hell. When I'm getting close to packing it in ill sign over everything before i go anywhere near the grave so the gov can suck my hairy balls

[–] 2 pts

On top of that the IRS came in and told me i needed to shell out 50,000 because i hadnt declared said assets, as if some indiivdual would know to do something like this. So at the end, i think 95% of the total assets were seized by a govt, be it European or American. Total value of assets: 750,000. Total lost to taxes and fees: 650,000

[–] 1 pt

At that point I'd just set fire to the lot.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Initially it was to prevent the top 1% wealth families from from a loophole to not pay taxes on cash and land. Now it’s a way all of us to pay for social programs.

[–] 1 pt

According to the IRS:

The federal government does not have an inheritance tax. The six states that impose an inheritance tax are:

Iowa Kentucky Maryland Nebraska New Jersey Pennsylvania

Inheritance taxes are yet another means for states to get revenue that they can then spend on budget items. At least, in theory. In reality it's another way for them to avoid having to be fiscally responsible with the taxes they already collect.

But doesn't the IRS count an inheritance as Wages, Tips, & Other Considerations, AKA "income?" So there's no specific federal Inheritance Tax, but they still hit you with a big bite for income, even though the person leaving it to you already paid taxes on it.

[–] 1 pt

...but they still hit you with a big bite for income, even though the person leaving it to you already paid taxes on it.

Yes. You are entirely correct. The Federal taxation powers are an insane overreach from what was originally intended.

[–] 1 pt

It prevents the middle class from developing generational wealth. That is why the rich have alm their holdings in corporations. Corporations are legal persons who never die.

[–] 0 pt

This is correct. Our masters don't want us to be independent, because then they cannot control us so easily.

[–] 1 pt

This is an example of one of those laws that backfire on the socialists. It's nice to think that the spoiled Rothschild children don't get to get all the free money of their parents. In practice however, it's just another burden on the middle class. Very rich families figure out how not to pay a cent.

Look up the Ten Planks of Communism...

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Joke answers aside a big part of the jewish problem is generational wealth. Since jews are rent seekers who never work they just keep building up a bigger and bigger share of the resources and make it impossible for anyone to earn their way up. It stifles innovation.

NSDAP wanted everyone to work even if it was intellectual work, since it makes you a better person, as part of that plan they had effectively at 100% inheritance tax on what would be, in today's money, anything over $1mil.

[–] 0 pt

In game theory, if you start with more capital, you'll - practically speaking - win out every time. So to avoid an entrenched class system that will widen overtime, tax inheritance allows the country to not be lord over by a group of generational billionaires/trillionaires that you can't get rid off.

That's in theory. In practice those you'd want to prevent from lording over you can hide their money and continue to lord over you for ever.

[–] 0 pt

Originally imposed as a populist method of preventing massive amounts of "inherited wealth" which was seen as corrupting and evil. Expanded to the point that a farmer can't pass the farm on to children due to large amount of cash demanded by the Fedgov at transfer, so the farm is sold to a large corporation and the kids get a part of the sale price. Lots of people use trusts to pass property down one or even two generations, including the very wealthy against whom the tax was originally directed. The small business owner who dies without putting the business into a trust with the kids gets bought out upon death, part of the money to the Fedgov, the rest to the kids. "Down with the wealthy!"

Load more (11 replies)