WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

Is that really true. I thought they has some special muscle twitch fiber thing that gives them that edge. Watching the Olympic trials all i see is baboons with braids and retarded names winning everything while the white man doesnt stand a chance. At least whites do well in the field events.

Is that really true. I thought they has some special muscle twitch fiber thing that gives them that edge. Watching the Olympic trials all i see is baboons with braids and retarded names winning everything while the white man doesnt stand a chance. At least whites do well in the field events.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I appreciate it. I studied human sciences but as you know everything is taught through a Marxist lense so you don't get to explore concepts like that. I've heard of those groups before but never presented so succinctly. A++

[–] 1 pt

The awesome thing to understand once you know this type of information is that people are just people. Niggers aren't bad, they are just different. Not all white people are puzzle solving geniuses there's a shitload of retards out there. Not all Asians are hive minds. Our genetics give us our baseline ranges of advantages and disadvantages. Our cultural, ethnic, and homelike environments provide a great deal of individualized pressure on what we do within those ranges.

The problem we have as a society isn't hate and xenophobia, it's not allowing people to understand that not everyone can be a rocket scientist or a basketball player or a writer. That we should work towards understanding our limits, pushing ourselves to maximize our strengths and minimize our weaknesses, and allow us to acknowledge that genetic subspecies have always and will always work better in their own environments than in forced inclusive social structures. Day geckos and leopard geckos are both geckos, but they have evolved to be great at very different things. We need to stop trying to think any of us are simply better or worse, and realize we are better or worse at certain things because our evolution has given us those advantages and we should be celebrating and promoting them. I think we get wrapped up in their "emotional control" scheme on both sides. We don't have to hate to understand, and we don't need to wipe reality away to protect people's feelings.

[–] 1 pt

That's a whole other angle on this and I couldn't agree more.

Shoving every differently-shaped piece into the same round hole isn't doing us any favors. For as much as the progressives like to "celebrate differences", they can't admit that different cultures have different strengths, weaknesses and needs. These distinctions are evident among people of somewhat similar genetics, much less the races.

In Germany, they have different education tracks for students depending on their aptitude and interest. If someone wants to go into a trade, they will start that path in a middle/high school geared towards them. Similar for college-minded.

How much more effective could we be if we recognized that we are not all the same and worked constructively within that mindset? Maybe if little black kids had a school that was structured for their aptitudes, they would not be so frustrated trying to fit within a system that's not designed for them.

[–] 0 pt

Aww thanks. There are lots of intertwining and cultural pressures and sub species isolation as well, but those are more recent and less overall impact full as the big picture movements and breeding.

[–] 1 pt

The single common ancestor theory is all that you hear now. Did these groups (minus homosapiens) appear around the same time? Or do they follow the pattern of increased complexity over time? Were there ever advanced societies within those groups before intermingling, as described in myths/stories like Lemuria or Hyperborea?

[–] 0 pt

So, there are several theories about that. The "first wave" out of Africa is the most popular. Thays what academic studies are based on.

Graecopithicus really fucks up that theory. So do many other "anomoly" finds. There really is no consensus. If you'd like my opinion I will gladly share.

I believe the origins of the modern human are much older than we understand, because I believe it started in the Mediterranean basin. There were other primates who were isolated and adapted in many parts of the world into unique and possibly fairly advanced species. The stories of giants and dwarves and such are probably based on these very ancient species who eventually died out because the environments they had adapted to changed. But us, as we understand, started 6 to 12 million users ago in the Mediterranean basin when the Gibraltar passage was blocked by a land plug.

The Mediterranean basin would have been a garden of eden. Below sea level so protected from crazy natural disasters and inclement weather, fertile, lush, and secure. A perfect environment for a species to develop. When the lad plug caved in and the Atlantic flooded the basin 5 million years ago, only stragglers and small isolated pockets of that protohuman survived, the ones who lived near the edge. They were dispersed through southern Europe, northern Africa, and the Levant. These isolated pockets began growing and developing and responding to their unique environmental pressures, slowly changing over time. That is my hypothesis.