Ofcourse there was lmao, race was common sense since the dawn of man, in the Bible for example non-Whites are referred to as "mamzers" which translates to mongrels/mixed breeds/wild animals. The word arab in Biblical Hebrew translates to "mixed origin" "mingled peoples", which is what they are, there are no single origin for arabs or their genetic cousins the jews, they are per definition banned from being Christians. So when kikes tell you that the Bible (either Testament) is a jewish book or Jesus Christ was a kike on a stick, tell them that the kikes are mixed breed mongrels who by definition are destined for the Lake of Fire.
The Greeks called them savages/barbarians.
The Romans enslaved them (and eventually got kiked and set the animals free).
Christian Europe simply didn't have to contend with non-Whites because kikes were banned in all of the Christian world.
You think the Nazi racial laws were hardcore? They even had honorary kikes. Christianity literally put death penalty on people who race mixed.
Like I said, slavery is a nothingburger historically for Whites, more Whites have been enslaved by non-Whites then Whites by other Whites. But to say it's a non-White thing is simply blasphemy, the White man was created to do Gods will on this earth, and the world was a much better place for everyone when the White man ruled.
>Ofcourse there was lmao, race was common sense since
No
The main concern during the middle age was the soul, when new people were encountered the question was whether they had a soul or not, whether they were creature of god / humans, or creature of the devil, or animals
That was the christian middle age, that was above all considerations
And when the new world was discovered, it was the central question for the vatican when it came to the people over there
You don't know that you don't know shit
Of course blood lines existed, but again, religion was front and center and above all else
How can you even argue this when it is so clear that you have not even read the Bible or understand it?
I don't know anything about oil drilling, so I don't pretend I do nor do I think I do, so I stay humble and don't speak about it as if I did.
Excuse me?!
First, sublimis deus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sublimis_Deus
Of course you never heard about it, OBVIOUSLY.
In Sublimis Deus, Paul III unequivocally declares the indigenous peoples of the Americas to be rational beings with souls, denouncing any idea to the contrary as directly inspired by the "enemy of the human race" (Satan). He goes on to condemn their reduction to slavery in the strongest terms, declaring it null and void for any people known as well as any that could be discovered in the future, entitles their right to liberty and property, and concludes with a call for their evangelization.
Now let's talk about the word "race" itself https://www.britannica.com/topic/race-human/The-history-of-the-idea-of-race
Race as a categorizing term referring to human beings was first used in the English language in the late 16th century.
The word "race" didn't even exist in the english language before the 16th century, that's a fact
The word "race", IS NOT in the bible. It's an INACCURATE translation, just like for the 6th commandment translated as "you shall not kill" (It's "murder", not "kill")
https://www.biblestudy.org/question/races.html
The word translated "race" in Romans 9:3 comes from the Greek word suggenes (Strong's Concordance Number #G4773). The word means a relative (by blood) and by extension a fellow countryman. Thayer's Greek Definitions agrees with this assessment. ... In the end, based on the Bible's definition, the only "race" that matters is that which comprises all humans. The truth is that all mankind has an opportunity to become sons of God through the grace of God and the blood of our Savior, Jesus Christ.
....
How can you even argue this when it is so clear that you have not even read the Bible or understand it?
Yeah sure. Projecting much?
Rhetorical question
(post is archived)