>the racial laws of the Bible makes it very clear that only Whites are Christians
Yes BUT
This is christianity, you read the old through the new
The old only is the jew stuff christianity≠judaism
So you are saying that our ancestors stole the second half of the Bible from the jews (who did not have a homeland, was banned from all White countries for the next 1700 years)? Even though the main protagonist in the allegedly stolen half of the Bible calls out these jews as being and I quote "liars, murderers, snakes, devils, Satan"? Even though the prophets of the allegedly "jewish" part of the Bible are the very same people (race) as the "non jewish" part?
It is called THE BIBLE, The Old Testament is the history of the White race up untill Jesus Christ, the New Testament is the story about Jesus Christ missionary and the period where the last White remnant left in todays Palestine left that shithole to literally never return (yes, the people of the Bible were told they would NEVER return to Jerusalem but that they would create a new Jerusalem).
Look
As demonstrated here https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/382338/23700753-2e11-4235-b460-b9e7744b6c1d#cmnts , your understanding of christianity and medieval europe is shallow, to say the least
So I will skip this one because I won't spend the next 15 mins debunking every single assertion in your post above, alright?
No.
YOUR "understanding" of what was literally common sense is what is lacking. The Bible is the history of the first White man Adam and his descendants, Adamites. Moses or the prophets didn't bother to write about asians, negroes or other races simply because they were of no concern to the white Adamites. The Bible is written by and for White people. However you are wrong in that it does mention race and even more so, race mixing. Deuteronomy 23:2
2 A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord.
The word bastard here is translated from the paleo-Hebrew word mamzer, Strong's Concordance tells us it's original meaning;
4464 mamzer mam-zare' from an unused root meaning to alienate; a mongrel
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/mongrel
mongrel noun
a dog whose parents are of different breeds
used to describe something of mixed origin
So a bastard that nowadays is someone born out of wedlock is not what wont get into Gods congregation, it is literally racemixers. So yes, race is very relevant even 4000 years ago when Deuterenomy was written. And your assertion that race wasn't relevant in medieval Europe is simply false, where were all the niggers and non-Whites before the jews started bringing slaves into Europe? Common sense.
You should read the parables of Jesus, specifically the one about the fishnet, wheats and tares..
Matthew 7:6
Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.
Do you believe Jesus Christ was literally saying not to teach the gospel to animals? Or was non-Adamites/Whites not considered humans (like the anthropologists of later days would affirm with "science")?
(post is archived)