Whites historically never had many slaves but to think it's sandnigger activity is retarded.
Someday we will probably know the truth behind the abolitionist movement, the fact that it happened after the end of 1700's (French Revolution, when the KIKES got emancipated in Europe) tells me that the KIKES did a little chutzpah move on Whitey.
They brought and sold the slaves to USA, then they lobbied for the freedom of said slaves.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolition_of_slavery_timeline
Polis of Athene Early sixth century BC The Athenian lawgiver Solon abolishes debt slavery of Athenian citizens and frees all Athenian citizens who had formerly been enslaved.[2][3] Athenian chattel slavery continued to be practiced, and the loss of debt-bondage as a competing source of compulsory labor may even have spurred slavery to become more important in the Athenian economy henceforth.[4]
326 BC Roman Republic Lex Poetelia Papiria abolishes Nexum contracts, a form of pledging the debt bondage of poor Roman citizens to wealthy creditors as security for loans. Chattel slavery was not abolished, and Roman slavery would continue to flourish for centuries.
590–604 Rome Pope Gregory I bans Jews from owning Christian slaves.
7th century Francia Queen Balthild, a former slave, and the Council of Chalon-sur-Saône (644–655) condemn the enslavement of Christians. Balthild purchases slaves, mostly Saxon, and manumits (frees) them.[8]
741–752 Rome Pope Zachary bans the sale of Christian slaves to Muslims, purchases all slaves acquired in the city by Venetian traders, and sets them free.
...
I was referring to the abolitionist movement in USA.
But as you can clearly see from your Wiki source, Whites had slaves aswell. Non-Whites (jews specifically) were banned from owning White slaves, Whites were not banned from owning White slaves (or non-White slaves). To blame everything "bad" on KIKES and arabs is stupid. We can all agree that we don't want to assimiliate with non-Whites but the act of slavery itself isn't a "non-White activity".
Just like the kikes have used the Holohoax to command their "morality" on Whites they also used that to peddle their "humanism/universalism" on Whites, which to it's core is anti-Christian.
Christianity built Western society, Christianity approves of slavery (with certain caveats).
>Whites were not banned from owning White slaves
First of all, there was no such thing like blacks/whites/browns and shit during the medieval era. There were christians, muslims, jews, heretics and pagans
Let's get shit straight here. The notion of race wasn't even a thing.
In 1315 already slavery was banned in france, almost entirely except in few ports. Any slave setting foot in france was automatically a free man. By royal decree.
>1315 France Louis X publishes a decree abolishing slavery and proclaiming that "France signifies freedom", that any slave setting foot on French ground should be freed.[19] However some limited cases of slavery continued until the 17th century in some of France's Mediterranean harbours in Provence, as well as until the 18th century in some of France's overseas territories.[20] Most aspects of serfdom are also eliminated de facto between 1315 and 1318.[21]
So, starting with the middle of the medieval era, slavery was already well on its way out. At least, when it comes to european on european slavery.
Slavery is all fun and games until you get a slave revolt/uprising right in the middle of a war at your borders.
>Christianity built Western society, Christianity approves of slavery (with certain caveats).
Christianity tried to justify it at one point or another (during the roman era, to accomodate the TPTB, and later on with the new world until they revised their position)
But early christian considered christian slaves as free men
(post is archived)