Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

831

It’s an office job. A new girl starts and her husband tested positive for covid (no symptoms) so now the employer is making everyone get vaccinated or they are not allowed to return to the office. My wife doesn’t want to lose her job, nor is she willing to stand up and say ‘no. This is wrong.’ She is passive and non confrontational like many Women so she is likely going to fold to the pressure and get the jab to keep her job. Any law fags here, is there any legal recourse? What should I do?

It’s an office job. A new girl starts and her husband tested positive for covid (no symptoms) so now the employer is making everyone get vaccinated or they are not allowed to return to the office. My wife doesn’t want to lose her job, nor is she willing to stand up and say ‘no. This is wrong.’ She is passive and non confrontational like many Women so she is likely going to fold to the pressure and get the jab to keep her job. Any law fags here, is there any legal recourse? What should I do?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (114).
[–] • 0 pt

How does the employer become liable if no one will admit that the vaccine is at fault? That has to be proven in court first.

[–] • 0 pt

No, just the fact that the employer is forcing/coercing his employees to take covidshot is a violation of federal law. Covid shot isn't licensed by the FDA.

https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/381980/fa0e8929-5c75-4b9b-bac2-fafb1aaba9d9#cmnts

[–] • 0 pt

That's a different argument than a liability case. And I don't think it applies to an at-will state. But I'm not a lawyer either. The liability issue will never be settled because no one is going to "prove" that the deaths are being caused by the shot.

Or maybe they will. Imagine the chaos if they do.

[–] • 0 pt

>That's a different argument than a liability case

Well first of all we're looking for a deterrent here, not a bag of easy money

Now, do you sincerely believe that violating a federal law, doesn't eventually imply "liabilities" at some point somewhere?

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/employers-may-be-liable-for-any-adverse-reaction-from-mandated-coronavirus-shots-osha

>Furthermore, it’s also possible employers requiring these injections may be held legally liable for violating federal law. According to America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS), products approved for emergency use only “are prohibited from being mandated by federal law.” The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s emergency use authorization (EUA) specifically states that individuals must have the free “option to accept or refuse” these vaccines. Many argue the prospect of being terminated from one’s job by refusing such vaccines certainly undermines such necessary freedom.

...