WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

737

What exactly is it meant to distract from?

Just muddying the waters? Or something more timely?

What exactly is it meant to distract from? Just muddying the waters? Or something more timely?

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

Well, that's the problem. Jews are arabs. They are semetic. The ashkenazi are Turkish European. They are Jewish by conversion. It is, however, possible they are of Israelite ancestry. Jews are not ruddy. Israelites of Adamic bloodlines are ruddy. This excludes Jews.

But, for example, the Irish and Scottish are of the Tribe of Dan. So very literally they are Israelites. Two hundred years ago and older this was common knowledge. This is why Jesus sent the apostles into Europe, to reclaim the lost lambs of Israel. It's why christianity is a White's religion and not semetic nor Jewish.

The Romans and Greeks also make clear that the Israelites are indistinguishable from any other European with exception for circumcision; as they are all of scythian ancestry. Meaning, as far as the people of the day are concerned, not only are the hebrews/Israelites not semites, they are white caucasians. This is repeated knowledge everywhere we look.

[–] 1 pt

Israelites of Adamic bloodlines are ruddy. This excludes Jews.

The descendants of Judah are Iddewan in Gaelic and referenced in commentary on the Scottish Declaration of Independence, and histories of the Gaels.

They are the same word. Iddewan and Judean.

Modern Khazars are not ethnically related to Judah, the 4th son of Jacob. They are semitic. Judah was not a semite. Judah, his father, and the entirety of the Israelites were ruddy Northern Europeans.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Oh fuck off. Turks are not european or white. They are semites that need to be *** .

Do you people just wake up every morning and use a random history generator to make this shit up?