Wahahaaa, you're retarded. Firstly, not only did you almost answer the question yourself - bc of the joos fcking around on the geo-political sphere, but any initial German 'acts of aggression' were legitimate responses to deliberate military/ economic threats to treaties, pacts and economic co-operations they held with those Counties.

Secondly , the 'blond German' was just the idealised Nordic Aryan, ya goof. Notice their racial beliefs included the fact that Aryanism had origins in the Indian continent and extended to Nepal and of which all the Greater European races were just another branch.

Now you confusing continued joo usury with European slavery when they are not the same thing .

It's clear your not very intelligent or cognitive, bc You don't seem able to understand the similarities or different subtleties involved, you're continuously conflating one thing with another and then explain something away with something else entirely.

You do realise Africa/ specifically Libya practices actual slavery today, not bc of imf loans or economic sanctions ??, dont cha.... You are quite fcking stupid ....

Yes world politics i could understand. Street-shitters talking fantasy retard level 'germany wanted to enslave all of europe' is just complete joo-inspired bs, that should be called out for the absolute rubbish it is ...