Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

330

I mean that's the only way anything against the narrative could prove it self... peer reviewed double blind studies the gold standard

I mean that's the only way anything against the narrative could prove it self... peer reviewed double blind studies the gold standard

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (12).
[–] • 0 pt

It's not even that. Peer review, even when done properly, is just someone looking over your paper for obvious errors, they never validate your data or challenge your conclusions. It's a glorified proof reading.