same amount of science they have that masks work
same amount of science they have that masks work
Amazing that an experimental gene therapy happens to also work against a strain no one saw coming,
Amazing that an experimental gene therapy happens to also work against a strain no one saw coming,
You worry too much.. don't over-think it.. it'll be alright.. a future jab will correct any previous wrongs.. previous standards in medical practices are just that; previous..
You worry too much.. don't over-think it.. it'll be alright.. a future jab will correct any previous wrongs.. previous standards in medical practices are just that; previous..
I happened to see a peers who is having minor almost non invasive surgery in two weeks papers he had on desk. In a huge highlighted paragraph. Says must present vacine card. Just glanced on accident as i was putting a file on his desk.... Wtf???
Can a doc actually require jabx2 for surgery already?
I happened to see a peers who is having minor almost non invasive surgery in two weeks papers he had on desk. In a huge highlighted paragraph. Says must present vacine card. Just glanced on accident as i was putting a file on his desk.... Wtf???
Can a doc actually require jabx2 for surgery already?
All the studies saying the vaccines are safe and effective have been done by the corporations making the vaccines, the same ones who are immune from liability.
All the studies saying the vaccines are safe and effective have been done by the corporations making the vaccines, the same ones who are immune from liability.
You can read the study for yourself: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01358-1/fulltext
Double blind studies have their limitations as well.
You can read the study for yourself: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01358-1/fulltext
Double blind studies have their limitations as well.
And peer reviewed is totally meaningless.
And peer reviewed is totally meaningless.
Pretty much, replication is what matters.
Pretty much, replication is what matters.
Yes, when your peers are getting the same soros money to say the same thing, peer review just shows who is also on the take.
Yes, when your peers are getting the same soros money to say the same thing, peer review just shows who is also on the take.
It's not even that. Peer review, even when done properly, is just someone looking over your paper for obvious errors, they never validate your data or challenge your conclusions. It's a glorified proof reading.
It's not even that. Peer review, even when done properly, is just someone looking over your paper for obvious errors, they never validate your data or challenge your conclusions. It's a glorified proof reading.
Clearly not
But a libtard that believe all the crap unloaded can surely believe this too
Clearly not
But a libtard that believe all the crap unloaded can surely believe this too
(post is archived)