> History is the study of documents. This is what actual historians do. Read all the primary and secondary sources they can find and try to boil it down into an understandable format. Primary sources are the testimony of people who were there. Official reports, private letters, etc. Secondary sources are things like compilations and newspapers. Of course historians can be completely filled with bias and outright lies and most people will never know. So can primary and secondary sources. To truly understand history you have to combine history with geography, sociology, politics, etymology, religion and a host of other things. You also, of course, have to be jew aware. The main stumbling block will be if you are unable to identify who is misleading you whether it be intentional or not. Your greatest tool in overcoming that is predictive models. If your modeling of the situation is predictive, it's potentially right. If it fails to predict it's almost certainly wrong. This is where liberals always fail. Their models are always wrong.