Then you are admitting that this wouldn't be a good, righteous, and moral act. If you don't have the conviction that what you are doing is right and you have to skulk around like our greatest allies, don't do it, find another solution.
Bombing a bridge and killing millions is moral? Impossible.
I was just poking holes in the logic because: an escalating tension military policy is suicidal. War has become clandestine.
I'm against civilian bombing. period. Leave the civilians out of this shit thank you very much.
The US nuked two cities full of civilians, firebombed the hell out of a handful of cities destroying them almost entirely. They were moral and justified in their eyes and in the eyes of the population.
China nuke Taiwan, let's send them a strongly worded letter via the UN!
I've condemned Dresden before and I'll condemn it again. To their infamy, the leadership bears that stain.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were terrible targets. Again, malice over rationality.
You seem to be saying more atrocities are due? -Bugger off, eh?
If China attacks they have a stupidly potent sea and air defense system, that we sold to them. Thats reasonable. Nukes? Stfu kid. Advocating for mass murder makes you a dick. Rethink your life a little.
(post is archived)