Bombing a bridge and killing millions is moral? Impossible.
I was just poking holes in the logic because: an escalating tension military policy is suicidal. War has become clandestine.
I'm against civilian bombing. period. Leave the civilians out of this shit thank you very much.
The US nuked two cities full of civilians, firebombed the hell out of a handful of cities destroying them almost entirely. They were moral and justified in their eyes and in the eyes of the population.
China nuke Taiwan, let's send them a strongly worded letter via the UN!
I've condemned Dresden before and I'll condemn it again. To their infamy, the leadership bears that stain.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were terrible targets. Again, malice over rationality.
You seem to be saying more atrocities are due? -Bugger off, eh?
If China attacks they have a stupidly potent sea and air defense system, that we sold to them. Thats reasonable. Nukes? Stfu kid. Advocating for mass murder makes you a dick. Rethink your life a little.
So what would you do if China nuked Taiwan? UN condemnation? Economic sanction? Sending thousands of young White men to pointlessly die?
China is financially supporting, producing, and exporting fentanyl to the US, killing over 20,000 Americans a year. Asking them to stop hasn't worked yet. You are advocating for letting them mass murder Americans you treasonous rat. Rethink your life.
(post is archived)