WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

the First Circuit reflected, “these unfocused fears must be balanced against the loss of public confidence in our justice system that could arise if criminal juries very often consisted of anonymous persons”.

https://www.rcfp.org/journals/news-media-and-law-summer-2016/right-access-juror-names-an/

[–] 1 pt

"“When the colonists imported the jury system to America,” a Massachusetts trial court recognized, “they brought with them a system in which a defendant in all types of criminal trials traditionally had been tried by individuals whom the defendant knew or, at least was highly likely to know.”"

"...and (5) extensive publicity that could enhance the possibility that jurors’ names would become public and expose them to intimidation or harassment.[18]"

Therefore niggers cannot ever be considered a "jury of peers" if a White man is the victim or if a White man is on trial in an interracial crime. This case makes it obvious.

"..."Appellate courts routinely refer to the empanelment of an anonymous jury as a “drastic measure”..."

The nigger tried to carjack an old unarmed White dude and shot him 8 times because he felt threatened. The nigger jury acquitted the nigger killer because niggers hate Whites.

I want to know where all the nigger jury live so I can interview them for a news story. They have nothing to fear from any criminal organization or drug cartel. I want to know why they let this nigger go free.