Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

416
I wanted to title this “should politicians make minimum wage?” but those faggots would just raise the minimum. If politicians made less money, they’d be forced to have regular jobs or at least manage their own business to survive. I believe a big reason politicians are so out of touch with reality is because they think their position gives them special status. Those cunts are civil servants, which means they work for the people, not the other way around. Lowering the salary would weed out the cunts that go in for the wrong reasons.

I wanted to title this “should politicians make minimum wage?” but those faggots would just raise the minimum.

If politicians made less money, they’d be forced to have regular jobs or at least manage their own business to survive. I believe a big reason politicians are so out of touch with reality is because they think their position gives them special status. Those cunts are civil servants, which means they work for the people, not the other way around. Lowering the salary would weed out the cunts that go in for the wrong reasons.

Yes, they shouldn’t be getting rich off of being a politician.
No, they need the money to ensure they don’t accept bribes (lol).
They’d just figure out a way to funnel more taxes into their pockets.
Where’s the FUCK YOU! option?

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

They should pay the taxpayers a flat percentage of what they steal.

[–] • 0 pt

Hah, make lobbyist donations 90% taxable.

[–] • 3 pts

The salary is not how they’re getting rich. It’s the lobbyist money and their spouses insider trading

[–] • 2 pts

Term limits

[–] • 2 pts

Term limits would void the need (desire) for a salary cap.

[–] • 1 pt

They can change that like Putin did 3 years ago.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

No, you're not thinking outside the box. Money is not how they're gonna be controlled by the public. We have to put in policies that make them essentially our servants regardless of how much money they earn.

Here's some ideas. 1. The candidates must have a biological child of their own who will be directly affected in the future by their policies. 2. The biological child of the political candidate must only be subjected to public schools for education. 3. In case the biological child of the political candidate fails to attend the public school for any reason, the candidate also must relinquish their seat. This would apply to the child of schooling age. If the child is younger than a schooling age, the candidate may not be considered. If the child is older than a schooling age, they must have graduated all schools without failing.

Just a few things to consider. I'm not saying it has to be like this. These are more like rough drafts.

[–] • 1 pt

As long as O's are allowed to work in the public sector, nothing will fix anything.

[–] • 1 pt

HA, nice... I laughed harder than I should have at that.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Results based rewards. Maybe? If the minister of forestry and environment has a track record of California forest fires. They should just be thrown into one.

[–] • 0 pt

Where is the option about the insider trading, which is where they make all their money?

[–] • 0 pt

It’s the kickbacks, not the salaries.

[–] • 0 pt

Term limits plus a government CC. All transactions published quarterly.

[–] • 0 pt

Won't do anything. They all take an oath to israel.