Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

672

It's an important question. If the "Right To Try Act" was later used to justify this rollout of experimental mRNA injections, that would suggest the possibility that the creation of the legislation was related to foreknowledge of the vaccine rollout.

However, if there is nothing in the legislation which was used to enable the unapproved mRNA injection rollout then we can conclude that the purpose was just the face value - to allow people more flexibility for the drugs they choose to try when terminally ill.

It's an important question. If the "Right To Try Act" was later used to justify this rollout of experimental mRNA injections, that would suggest the possibility that the creation of the legislation was related to foreknowledge of the vaccine rollout. However, if there is nothing in the legislation which was used to enable the unapproved mRNA injection rollout then we can conclude that the purpose was just the face value - to allow people more flexibility for the drugs they choose to try when terminally ill.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (6).
[–] • 2 pts

Right to Try was 2018, and gave access to non-FDA approved drugs if you had a life-threatening condition, tried approved options and couldn't access a clinical trial. Supposed to be able to get around the FDA.. You should be able to get access to the therapeutics like HCQ now even without Right to Try. Vaccines are emergency FDA authorized