Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

305

So its due tomorrow, the prompt is:

Identify a specific situation (either one-on-one or in a group) in which you felt that you were not communicating very well with the someone due to differing expectations of appropriateness. Explain how an increase in diversity could have been used to better understand the other party?

So its due tomorrow, the prompt is: >Identify a specific situation (either one-on-one or in a group) in which you felt that you were not communicating very well with the someone due to differing expectations of appropriateness. Explain how an increase in diversity could have been used to better understand the other party?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (49).
[–] • 0 pt

Any time you have to write something like this, its always in the context of how whitey bad, yaaddi yadda. You have to write from the context of assumed diversity, which means the current definition and the prompt essentially force you to slander whites in the process. Every topic i can think of (caste system, indian gender roles, african violence, gay violence) would essentially be tabboo or an insta fail