It's just a random label on to which they attach a bunch of rules of trade. It changes all the time and people attach meaning to lables however it suits them. Just look at KLDB talking a bunch of nonsense as a native.
For example, people say communism is the workers owning the means of production. But, this doesn't make sense. Everyone already owns the means of production, their own labour. Most people just happen to trade their labour others that have amassed larger economies of trade. Not only that, everyone is free to amass their own economies of scale and trade with individual labourers. Communism is a nonsense label on to which people project nonsense ideas, the least of which is that you can never ever take away a persons ownership over the means of their bodies production ... this is just not possible.
I don't believe there are any economic systems at all. I think it all abstracts down to this:
- There is only trade. You have a thing and I have another thing. We exchange our things and through that trade we establish the value of each thing.
That's it. That is all there is. Everything beyond that is just a third person showing and setting arbitrary rules of trade. So, some people show up and say there should be no rules, people trade as they see fit, they carry guns and settle their own disputes. Other people show up, are jealous, and want to apply a rule that states that no single person can have a thing, all things must be put in a pile and a central committee decides how to split up the pile of things. Other people show up and have no things but have guns and say, give me your things. Sometimes the two guys with things they want to trade say, there are a lot of people with guns, we need some guns, also let's put borders around our village so we can trade without any problems. And so forth.
So, I'm not even sure that Hitler could agree with what national socialism was when it started vs what it was when it ended.
In previous posts I spoke about how jews perpetually use a kind of mental chinese trap on white people using some simple techniques. They redefine words and create new categories for things to get people to choose side and split up the population in order to apply misdirection get them to focus on those things while they do a sleight of hand and start to insert policies and rules into our system one by one to change things in their favour.
Just look at the concept of economics above. Everyone is always arguing about left vs right, capitalism vs socialism ... that's all bullshit. The only thing that matters is the right to trade (property rights) and war strategies on how you help your people acquire more resources.
That is all this is about. As long as you are talking about communism, capitalism, nazis you aren't talking about your people and what is best for thim.
That is what the game of shifting narratives does.
// EDIT: The way you would test this is to just put together a bullet point list of all the values that are under each economic lable and ask you self these two questions:
If I add or take away any item on this list, is the label still true?
How many values are shared between most if not all economic labels.
(post is archived)