That's a better line of argumentation, and more reasonable. A business has some kind of obligation to not have hidden unsafe things you'll get hurt on without warning. Requiring "vaccination" is hiding dangers to customers unless they disclose the actual risks.
That's a better line of argumentation, and more reasonable. A business has some kind of obligation to not have hidden unsafe things you'll get hurt on without warning. Requiring "vaccination" is hiding dangers to customers unless they disclose the actual risks.
Does that mean if they require shirts and shoes the store is liable if your shoes have toxic chemicals that poison you?
Does that mean if they require shirts and shoes the store is liable if your shoes have toxic chemicals that poison you?
If they required a particular brand and type, whose dangers were not disclosed by the store or the manufacturer, maybe.
If they required a particular brand and type, whose dangers were not disclosed by the store or the manufacturer, maybe.
Are they requiring a particular brand or type of vaccine?
Are they requiring a particular brand or type of vaccine?
(post is archived)