RATG13 is fake. Bad lady typed it into a computer. SARS-2 is a failed attempt at an HIV vaccine.
(Disclaimer: I "trust the science" when done properly and without bias.)
At this stage in the game, it is methodologically demonstrable that the dangers of SARS COV 2 were greatly exaggerated and the measures taken; highly unnecessary. It is also clear that despite the obviousness of this, the media and Internet continue to be controlled into portraying a very one sided point of view in contradiction with reality.
I'm always afraid of the "assumption close." The assumption close is a sales tactic whereby your potential buyer's frame of mind is controlled by your frame of mind. You choose your words and adopt the mindset according to the reality that they are already going to buy your product. An example is, "You're here to decide whether or not you want the sedan or the SUV." This sentence already assumes the buyer is going to buy a car.
When it comes to the Left versus Right "choice"... notice that you are already assumption closed into being pro-war, anti-transparency, and pro-spying on you.
With SARS COV 2, I think we, as a society, have an obligation to ask, "Hey... did the Wuhan Institute of Virology, in proxy partnerships with Microsoft, make a digital forgery of a genome?"
All you crazy conspiracy theorists who think these people are into black magic... how about that for a spell? Conjuring a fake genome into reality? It is actually easy to do using CRISPR. You can assemble, piece by piece, a genomic sequence one nucleotide at a time. But, what are the odds that your fake sequence will reproduce? There is a lot of food for thought, there.
Unfortunately, this is a big brain issue.
Let us say I am totally wrong. We could have an expert show up in this thread and probably give a reasonable and convincing explanation as to why I am totally incorrect. Would an average person be able to understand?
Let's inverse that. Let's say another user comes on and then gives a perfectly reasonable explanation the other way. How would lurkers know the difference?
It's a problem. I probably need to make pictures. Either way, unless you are a virologist, all of us are in learning mode when it comes to this subject matter. But let's fast forward through what some of that looks like:
Maskerbator: "It's real. You're an idiot if you think it's fake. They've got full de novo sequences from Vietnam and Arizona."
CapitolRiotNazi: "Dude, if they can fake the news, they can fake the sequences. How many people do you need to fake a lab result? 5? 10? How many people does it take to fake the news? Like 1,000."
Even if Maskerbator has downloaded the genomic sequences and read the abstracts, he has no idea what the specifics of the de novo sequencing were in regards to where bias can be entered and that is merely a file on a computer... a negative control file. A black list of things to be excluded by the sequencer.
The vast majority of the sequences we see are generated with the Illumina and other similar software, where the software makers are explicitly partnered with Microsoft. If you go to the BLAST database, most of what you see are sequences generated using the Wuhan reference genome and someone else's negative control list. It is very easy to only see what you want to see, in this circumstance, which is why the "de novo" conversation is the more relevant one.
Personally, I came to the conclusion that it would be far easier for me to digitally mock up a fictional SARS COV 2 strain... my own de novo process... then forge the paper for the submission (I know... we still need to have the names of a reputable team). This way, I would have outputted the same exact work product without having to actually own a lab.
Hypothetically speaking, let's say we kidnap and hold a team of scientists captive. Let's pick the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Oh look, what a coincidence!
Oh, look... the password still works:
https://pic8.co/sh/HZVq77.jpeg
But... that can't be real, can it?
“Neo-Nazis and white supremacists capitalized on the lists and published them aggressively across their venues,” said Rita Katz, SITE’s executive director.
kek
And while they all like to claim they weren't accessed...
Should we be concerned when World Health officials, in particular, have passwords like 3bola0AD?
There is a reason these institutions were grouped together; because of their work together.
But, if we were faking a genome, all we would need is control of their communications. Then, we could correspond in their place; submitting a paper... uploading a genome, etc.
The World Bank worked with the World Health Organization to make pandemic bonds. When the pandemic bonds triggered, what happened? First, there was a debate about whether or not they should pay out, or not. There were not enough dead to pay out, originally, but cases were artificially boosted to get around this.
https://www.france24.com/en/20170628-world-bank-raises-500-mn-with-pandemic-bonds
But second, and more importantly, the triggering of the bonds triggered agreements involving your tax dollars... every country's tax dollars. While the investors were involved, immediately, with the $500 million, it was chump change compared to what spelling out a few words on their agreements was able to do.
By artificially overstating the danger, every large corporation in the world was able to put their hand out and steal your tax dollars. This was an act of the weaponized Medical Industrial Complex who made laws to lock you in your homes without being an elected power.
Joe Biden knew about it in October 2019.
https://www.newsweek.com/biden-warned-one-year-ago-before-covid-us-not-prepared-pandemic-1541995
https://mashable.com/article/joe-biden-pandemic-tweet-october-2019/
FYI: World War 3 is hot and it is these corporations with their hands out that are monetizing every moment of your existence. These are the people who steal your votes for money. These are the people who allow Epstein and his customers to run free.
In this unconventional warfare, entire armies have been locked down. The Medical Industrial Complex is your enemy and they are actively stealing your money and your freedom and poisoning you on purpose.
Big Tech has declared war on every free man, woman and child. The mainstream media. Internet astroturfers. Mossad. Clandestine Information Operation groups. These people hate themselves and they hate you and they will say whatever it takes to get your money.
All of the major corporations knew about it in November 2019:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoLw-Q8X174
The multi trillion dollar scam is still in full swing.
Stalin couldn't have dreamed of having a fraction of the power these groups have over your life. These groups have more power than any totalitarian dictator in history and this is the scam they used to do it.
So, let's go ahead and do the responsible thing and ask if Wuhan could have made a digital forgery, first, before anything else, at all. Before lock downs, mask mandates or vaccines. Why not ask this simple question and make it very public? Why not use a new de novo sequence as the reference genome? Like one from an institution we trust? Whose scientists aren't captives?
Why is that too much to ask?
It would be fairly easy to fake a genome sequence. Particularly if you weren't required to publish the original data, only the FASTA sequence.
(post is archived)