Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Section 230 is precisely that, a law prohibiting the free exercise of speech by tech companies.

(2) Civil liability No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of— (A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or (B) any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).[1]

These mega tech companies are felons because Section 230 is null and void, it never applied, it never protected them. It's always been a felony to do what they've been doing, they're just riding on the hope that the public never realizes it.

>Amendment I >Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Section 230 is precisely that, a law prohibiting the free exercise of speech by tech companies. >(2) Civil liability No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of— (A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or (B) any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).[1] These mega tech companies are felons because Section 230 is null and void, it never applied, it never protected them. It's always been a felony to do what they've been doing, they're just riding on the hope that the public never realizes it.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (23).
[–] • 1 pt

That's not exactly how it works. The statute sets limits for civil liability. There is no cognizable constitutional right to be able to sue tech companies in civil court.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

How this works is that these major tech companies did something for the US government and the leverage was built into the scheme.

It's like any special operation that violates the law. If the operative doesn't follow orders for the rest of their lives, to the letter, the person that directed them arrests them using the documentation they collected, the dirt on their operatives, and the public cheers, if they ever find out about it.

The tech companies haven't been following orders.

Looks like you're not either.

The USA has problems with chain of command, too many rogue managers are giving their employees their own directions and operating independently after getting funding from other actors. Do you know which country you're working for bro?