WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

554

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Section 230 is precisely that, a law prohibiting the free exercise of speech by tech companies.

(2) Civil liability No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of— (A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or (B) any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).[1]

These mega tech companies are felons because Section 230 is null and void, it never applied, it never protected them. It's always been a felony to do what they've been doing, they're just riding on the hope that the public never realizes it.

>Amendment I >Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Section 230 is precisely that, a law prohibiting the free exercise of speech by tech companies. >(2) Civil liability No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of— (A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or (B) any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).[1] These mega tech companies are felons because Section 230 is null and void, it never applied, it never protected them. It's always been a felony to do what they've been doing, they're just riding on the hope that the public never realizes it.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts (edited )

They're common carriers.

Utility is a sub-distinction.

The application of law to these companies is due to their being common carriers.

There's no real point in discussing the details, not least of all because it's still Constitutionally illegal to offer protections like Section 230 does, and it's already done. Orders like this can't be rescinded. The big tech companies became more trouble than they were worth. All that's left to do is make it look organic, which I honestly don't care about much anymore.

[–] 0 pt

Common carrier is a telecom term. The term for physical entities that provide life necessary services, is utility. "Big Tech" is neither term you use.

If it's so illegal, why are you here? Go get a lawyer and "fix" it.

[–] 0 pt

A better question you should ask is after the mods are gone because they ceased to serve US interests, what is the next category of obsolete or problematic cog in the system.

Maybe it's all the astroturfing cells the pentagon hires to manage public opinion and break up public organization.

https://www.ibtimes.sg/pentagons-shadow-warriors-60000-ultra-hi-tech-operatives-take-covet-warfare-next-level-57565

Too bad they aren't being more useful. No doubt it's because the chain of command has become so warped that they don't know who they're working for anymore and renegade contractors have been making up their own orders without a means to quantify, track, or apprehend them.

https://invidious.ethibox.fr/watch?v=wggVs0rRqds