So the government should force a private entity to provide services it wishes not to? That's what you're asking for. Then there is the issue of the companies first amendment rights as well.
This is far more complicated than you think.
They already do for transportation, electricity, gas, trash, water, phone service, internet service, and mail service.
It's actually not complicated at all.
Imagine if the water company could turn off your water because they didn't like you criticizing the Jews. That's what these internet communication services are doing and it's a major federal crime and they have no legal protection for what they're doing.
A Constitutionally illegal law does not protect you from prosecution. It's null and void, it never applied because it never was a legitimate part of the legal code, and you're liable for everything you did during that time because you should have known better.
RIP facebook mods. You're going to jail. And I know that because I wrote the script over a decade ago for how to dismantle the tech companies if they stopped being useful to US objectives. There's a couple trillion dollars in a trust to carry it out and a portion of US contractor's sole purpose is to document crimes like these so when the trigger is pulled there's a bullet in the barrel. Schemes like Section 230 always have a killswitch if it gets out of hand. You should have known better.
An internet service is a service that is not essential and private.
You know why the dems are moving to require paid astroturfers to disclose their sponsor online with criminal consequences for violations?
Because people like you bother people like me.
For the time being, I use you guys as a way to refine rhetoric and catalogue your material so I can innoculate people against it. When you're all gone, it will make it slightly more complicated, but I think it's worth it in the long run.
They already do for transportation, electricity, gas, trash, water, phone service, internet service, and mail service.
These, minus transportation and internet, are classed as utilities, the internet is not a utility, neither is transportation. When has a transportation company been forced to provide service?
As tech companies aren't utilities, and also have first amendment rights, what you are asking for is either 1) violate the companies first amendment rights, 2) class these companies services as utilities.
If you are so sure of what you say, get your lawyer and get to work.
They're common carriers.
Utility is a sub-distinction.
The application of law to these companies is due to their being common carriers.
There's no real point in discussing the details, not least of all because it's still Constitutionally illegal to offer protections like Section 230 does, and it's already done. Orders like this can't be rescinded. The big tech companies became more trouble than they were worth. All that's left to do is make it look organic, which I honestly don't care about much anymore.
Corporations and companies are NOT people and the bullshit laws that claim they are are also unconstitutional. If such an entity gets political it is corruption and should not be allowed though the constitution is ignored and not followed anymore......
Corporations and companies are NOT people and the bullshit laws that claim they are are also unconstitutional.
So you just figured this out, and all the lawyers in the rest of the country didn't? What are you waiting for?
Rights are for individuals not corporations.
(post is archived)