Just like a person with tattoos can take an MRI and be fine, I’d imagine the vaxxed will be fine.
Whether or not it interferes with the machine’s ability to get a proper scan is another question entirely.
Just like a person with tattoos can take an MRI and be fine, I’d imagine the vaxxed will be fine.
Whether or not it interferes with the machine’s ability to get a proper scan is another question entirely.
Tats have significantly lower EM fields and are highly localized. Where this is injecting magnetic nano particles into the body which is designed to deliver mRNA into cells. Meaning they are presumably now part of your cells. Which means it's not localized. It's now part of your body. Forever.
What's the implication of an MRI relative to the injection site?
Tats have significantly lower EM fields and are highly localized. Where this is injecting magnetic nano particles into the body which is designed to deliver mRNA into cells. Meaning they are presumably now part of your cells. Which means it's not localized. It's now part of your body. Forever.
What's the implication of an MRI relative to the injection site?
(post is archived)