WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

791

I used to think they were cool, based entirely on what the media presented on the subject.

But as I got older and looked more closely at the society I live in I realized they're scum and ultimately responsible for the problems in the USA, which my generation and ethnicity have borne the brunt of.

My response now is something like to someone saying their profession was stealing bicycles or spreading shit on the walls of bathrooms.

And it's conflicted because I understand the reasons they probably sought out the profession or how they were recruited. There are good reasons to work for these various agencies, but it's clear that upon employment and being bound up in various clauses dictating the direction a person's life can take indefinitely all those good intentions are put aside by a few corrupt appointed officials they feel obligated to follow.

If anything these agencies represent a trap for the people that would otherwise fix the country on their own agency. The crooks in the government collect the good people in one place and tell them to kill each other if they step out of line. It's that dynamic of self censorship and group reinforcement under a bad regime that keeps them paralyzed. That's just one example of how organizational structures and the underlying ideas can force people to do things against their will and best interests. But being an idea, an intangible thing that can change, it's also a vulnerability.

It's not steel, concrete, or bullets that keep the Federal agencies from reforming, it's just a set of a few ideas that subjugate them to the will, or absence of it, of a supervisor, a director, etc.. But it is just an idea and ideas don't have to correspond to the physical world or the cascading impacts of physical actions. Sometimes you just drop a glass of coffee on a sheep skin rug. There was no intention behind it, but that action ricochets and cascades into changes in the environment. Sometimes you have to throw away the carpet, and then since you're already doing that you decide to redesign the room. Furniture moves, the walls get painted, and the changes might make you feel better, worse, or precipitate some other long term changes.

There's a technique of deprogramming people with irrational behavior, irrational behavior based on ideas that can sometimes morph into repetitive behaviors or life dysfunction, where people are specifically introduced to and confronted by physical realities that conflict with their views. It's really useful for people that go around flipping light switches on and off or washing their hands until they bleed. Maybe you replace the light switch with a button, or maybe you turn off the water and after a period of panic they come to understand the catastrophe they were anticipating from not repeating the ritualistic behavior was unfounded. It's okay, and the warped perception of the world, the relationship between behavior and results, was unfounded.

But what happens when one of these psychological earworms gets into a an agency and establishes itself with group reinforcement, perpetuating itself like a virus? Like an endemic hotspot of irrational dysfunction. How does it get cleared? How does a monochromatic room change when a person feels committed to a theme they've already invested in? Maybe someone drops a coffee on the lynchpin of the theme, a rug.

With the intelligence agencies and law enforcement, on the brink of collapse from one factor or another, run into the ground by an aberrant program and set of objectives from a bygone era, how quickly could they change and reform if someone dropped a coffee?

It's not that anyone is really alone. As long as we are human we are connected in a mesh of interactions and reverberations of behaviors and the ideas underlying them. From the most remote blacksite to remote uncontacted tribes wondering what the new lights in the sky could mean, we're all interacting and echoing on one level or another.

There's a schedule and a set of objectives that isn’t determined by shadow money or who you know. It’s determined by the cumulative capacity and circumstances of the world’s population. It’s a hidden hand, hidden in system interactions, like the set of signals initiating a hive of bees to attack or a colony of suspended phyto-plankton deciding to emit light.

https://invidiou.site/watch?v=wggVs0rRqds

They’re killing people. They’ve been doing it for a long time. They’ve been destroying people’s lives testing methods of population control, because they don’t have a mandate to do what they want to the population, if they even want it anymore. They’ve been poisoning the US population to make them complacent and terrorizing them endlessly in the hopes that it will deplete the public’s ability to address them. The heads of the various agencies are burned out and broken puppets with no autonomy and the people giving them directions are equally directionless, carrying out directions that seemed like a good idea a half a century ago and which are fueled by immunity enabling them to carry out their primal instincts upon the public with no repercussions until the guilt turns the very advocates of this system into cynical saboteurs.

And I think I’ve seen a few of these people at the top and spoken to them at length. Their actions and words are a kind of blatant pragmatism of self preservation, but their eyes are like a junky that is disgusted with themselves. Their eyes say “just kill me, please kill me, please make it stop, make me stop”. And like a junkie closing their eyes and lifting their hands from the wheel on the freeway, they hope to be freed by some event they have chosen to release control over, by some stranger stopping them for the public good they’re secretly rooting for.

Sometimes madness becomes the norm, sometimes it has a PR team and people come to believe it is a good thing. Human behavior is not entirely rational. But it’s still madness and still does harm. Civilizations are difficult things to design in a way that they self perpetuate without becoming toxic and self defeating, and its even more difficult to dismantle an old design that has run out of control before it triggers a collapse in every region it operates. The Federal agencies are like that, like an out of control chemical fire where everyone has an indeterminate amount of time to make a decision to try to put it out or run before something explodes.

You’ll be able to sleep soon.

I used to think they were cool, based entirely on what the media presented on the subject. But as I got older and looked more closely at the society I live in I realized they're scum and ultimately responsible for the problems in the USA, which my generation and ethnicity have borne the brunt of. My response now is something like to someone saying their profession was stealing bicycles or spreading shit on the walls of bathrooms. And it's conflicted because I understand the reasons they probably sought out the profession or how they were recruited. There are good reasons to work for these various agencies, but it's clear that upon employment and being bound up in various clauses dictating the direction a person's life can take indefinitely all those good intentions are put aside by a few corrupt appointed officials they feel obligated to follow. If anything these agencies represent a trap for the people that would otherwise fix the country on their own agency. The crooks in the government collect the good people in one place and tell them to kill each other if they step out of line. It's that dynamic of self censorship and group reinforcement under a bad regime that keeps them paralyzed. That's just one example of how organizational structures and the underlying ideas can force people to do things against their will and best interests. But being an idea, an intangible thing that can change, it's also a vulnerability. It's not steel, concrete, or bullets that keep the Federal agencies from reforming, it's just a set of a few ideas that subjugate them to the will, or absence of it, of a supervisor, a director, etc.. But it is just an idea and ideas don't have to correspond to the physical world or the cascading impacts of physical actions. Sometimes you just drop a glass of coffee on a sheep skin rug. There was no intention behind it, but that action ricochets and cascades into changes in the environment. Sometimes you have to throw away the carpet, and then since you're already doing that you decide to redesign the room. Furniture moves, the walls get painted, and the changes might make you feel better, worse, or precipitate some other long term changes. There's a technique of deprogramming people with irrational behavior, irrational behavior based on ideas that can sometimes morph into repetitive behaviors or life dysfunction, where people are specifically introduced to and confronted by physical realities that conflict with their views. It's really useful for people that go around flipping light switches on and off or washing their hands until they bleed. Maybe you replace the light switch with a button, or maybe you turn off the water and after a period of panic they come to understand the catastrophe they were anticipating from not repeating the ritualistic behavior was unfounded. It's okay, and the warped perception of the world, the relationship between behavior and results, was unfounded. But what happens when one of these psychological earworms gets into a an agency and establishes itself with group reinforcement, perpetuating itself like a virus? Like an endemic hotspot of irrational dysfunction. How does it get cleared? How does a monochromatic room change when a person feels committed to a theme they've already invested in? Maybe someone drops a coffee on the lynchpin of the theme, a rug. With the intelligence agencies and law enforcement, on the brink of collapse from one factor or another, run into the ground by an aberrant program and set of objectives from a bygone era, how quickly could they change and reform if someone dropped a coffee? It's not that anyone is really alone. As long as we are human we are connected in a mesh of interactions and reverberations of behaviors and the ideas underlying them. From the most remote blacksite to remote uncontacted tribes wondering what the new lights in the sky could mean, we're all interacting and echoing on one level or another. There's a schedule and a set of objectives that isn’t determined by shadow money or who you know. It’s determined by the cumulative capacity and circumstances of the world’s population. It’s a hidden hand, hidden in system interactions, like the set of signals initiating a hive of bees to attack or a colony of suspended phyto-plankton deciding to emit light. https://invidiou.site/watch?v=wggVs0rRqds They’re killing people. They’ve been doing it for a long time. They’ve been destroying people’s lives testing methods of population control, because they don’t have a mandate to do what they want to the population, if they even want it anymore. They’ve been poisoning the US population to make them complacent and terrorizing them endlessly in the hopes that it will deplete the public’s ability to address them. The heads of the various agencies are burned out and broken puppets with no autonomy and the people giving them directions are equally directionless, carrying out directions that seemed like a good idea a half a century ago and which are fueled by immunity enabling them to carry out their primal instincts upon the public with no repercussions until the guilt turns the very advocates of this system into cynical saboteurs. And I think I’ve seen a few of these people at the top and spoken to them at length. Their actions and words are a kind of blatant pragmatism of self preservation, but their eyes are like a junky that is disgusted with themselves. Their eyes say “just kill me, please kill me, please make it stop, make me stop”. And like a junkie closing their eyes and lifting their hands from the wheel on the freeway, they hope to be freed by some event they have chosen to release control over, by some stranger stopping them for the public good they’re secretly rooting for. Sometimes madness becomes the norm, sometimes it has a PR team and people come to believe it is a good thing. Human behavior is not entirely rational. But it’s still madness and still does harm. Civilizations are difficult things to design in a way that they self perpetuate without becoming toxic and self defeating, and its even more difficult to dismantle an old design that has run out of control before it triggers a collapse in every region it operates. The Federal agencies are like that, like an out of control chemical fire where everyone has an indeterminate amount of time to make a decision to try to put it out or run before something explodes. You’ll be able to sleep soon.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

I write SOPs, mostly, now, for small IT projects, but I used to do mapping for whoever needed it and specialized in remote location deployments where connectivity needed to be implemented. Technology has expanded quite a bit so most of what I used to do is way easier to accomplish. I used to manually have to point dishes at satellites, for example. Now, they home in automatically.

CIA assets involved in running drugs, guns or people, run astroturfing campaigns, or otherwise shitty, unethical and unconstitutional behavior whereby it is clear they hate you, the average person, and these shit bags should be fed to dogs as they are seditious enemy combatants.

Most are just fooled into thinking they are doing something good. Most of the direct action operators legitimately believe in doing good, but are gullible enough to think their leaders are somewhat honest.

Some are genuinely good guys and they never see a shady task.

A DSS guy asked me what I do when I get an obviously dirty client that I have no choice to work for. I told him I do an amazing job for them, appear to be great friends, ponder who hates them, then reveal them to their enemy. So, for you good guys, out there, reveal the bad guys to other bad guys surreptitiously and create small faction wars. It's like SWATting, but you tell rival cartels.

He actually took my advice, once, and it caused a small hiccup of international chaos. It was great. What do you do when your assignment insists you smuggle gold out of a small foreign country? Tell the paramilitary forces of his neighboring country how to find it. Nothing like a visit from the Tonton Macoute in the middle of the night to raise the blood pressure.

CIA guys aren't a type, I've found. They are all kinds of things from all kinds of backgrounds.

FBI guys are mostly SJW zombies at the bottom, closet faggots throughout, a bunch of perverts, and their leadership are CIA.

DHS is 99% sleeping bureaucrats. Sabotage by bloat. Generally, they're pretty boring people, just milking a bullshit job. Their hands always seem to be tied in the field and their ability to make an impact always seems to be neutered. It's like they're around to babysit contractors, half the time.

The guys I like in DHS are usually former military and are usually operating under multiple directives.

Special operators, in any of these agencies, are usually elitist dicks. While I can work well with any of them and their skills are on point, (I respect what they can do in a group with some long guns) they often can't get over themselves long enough to have a beer with average people.

The low tier teams are really bad about this. SEALS are especially egotistical and the opposite of humble and aren't usually fun to hang out with, especially one on one. In fact, low tier team guys will often start fights in bars and shit just because.

You ever hear about AF 22nd guys? No, because they aren't putting themselves out there to be media darlings of the special forces. AF 22nd guys don't have Facebook accounts and SEALs are all over social media especially dating sites, despite being taught proper op sec.

The tier 1 operators are usually tempered enough not to be blatant dicks, but a tier 1 operator... especially one from leadership... they're a special breed. These are my favorite people to work with because they get results without extra bullshit.

What happens, at different stages, is you begin to work in environments where there are progressively less and less rules. Unfortunately, a lot of people can't keep their moral compass intact when in a situation with no rules.

The field is a great divider and I think few people who are smart and awake can make it to the top without being corrupted. The uncorruptable are usually excluded or given busy work.

However, the ruling class needs level headed guys who can hit heavy with no drama. The ruling class needs results and the literal faggots and SJWs are simply not capable of deploying to a remote location in a harsh environment. Not even for a couple of days.

Just look at the softies in charge. You think, at any stage in his life, Jim Comey could deploy to a random desert on a moment's notice, set up sensitive equipment while hiding and defending against locals? Biden? Bush? Trump? Think any political leader in the US could do it? Brennan? Clapper?

No, not at any stage in their life could they do the shit they require their peons to do. They do not deserve to be in charge if they cannot produce satisfactory results.

[–] 1 pt

Just look at the softies in charge. You think, at any stage in his life, Jim Comey could deploy to a random desert on a moment's notice, set up sensitive equipment while hiding and defending against locals? Biden? Bush? Trump? Think any political leader in the US could do it? Brennan? Clapper?

I think that most elements of the USA have a leadership crisis.

The uncorruptable are usually excluded or given busy work.

And while not in government, I've see the dynamics of organizations and how, once corruption establishes itself, the crooks invest heavily in keeping intelligent / ethical people out to avoid being thrown out themselves or exposed. I think this filtering process like you mentioned is a major problem with organizing people over time that needs a compensation mechanism.

One element of CIA operations was supposed to be just that at one time I think, the placement of operatives into major organizations of every type. And the rationale warped into accepting or encouraging corruption since it gave the CIA more leverage over the organization that could be used at a later time. The end result, the normalization of corruption that after being established in society, normalized within the CIA itself.

Some of the older writings of the CIA are so clear and benevolent, but clearly, given the state we as a country are in today, something went seriously wrong.

[–] 3 pts

Zero trust policies are the answer and we have had the tech for it since the Pentium 286.

Organizations need to be transparent to other organizations and the public for checks and balances and blockchain technology is able to keep a reliable ledger of voting, finances, and even decision trees.

That apparatus used by the government to spy on the citizenry? It needs to be turned around and aimed at politicians and bureaucrats.

There needs to be a time release on documents, which could easily be managed by blockchain. 50 years is enough to keep something locked down. There is no good reason to keep something secret past 100 years.

The secrecy apparatus eliminated the ability for the people to interject and vote on solutions to make better policy.

Policy is now determined by seditious enemy combatamts.

[–] 3 pts

There is no good reason to keep something secret past 100 years.

I don't know about that. Countries can hold grudges for things that happened a century ago. A century is really just a blink of an eye.

I don't know if transparency is the answer since it can sometimes remove autonomy from an organization, especially in an environment of soft terrorism like the USA where Jews and a few other groups terrorize people and try to destroy their lives to the fullest extent the law will allow for doing something they don't want.

One of the things that crippled White Nationalism the most was a kind of transparency where other groups were allowed to participating in decision making, making it so Whites could not advance their own interests without attracting the attention of a group like the Jews. Of course that problem stops when Whites decide to pursue the same soft terrorism tactics they do.