I write SOPs, mostly, now, for small IT projects, but I used to do mapping for whoever needed it and specialized in remote location deployments where connectivity needed to be implemented. Technology has expanded quite a bit so most of what I used to do is way easier to accomplish. I used to manually have to point dishes at satellites, for example. Now, they home in automatically.
CIA assets involved in running drugs, guns or people, run astroturfing campaigns, or otherwise shitty, unethical and unconstitutional behavior whereby it is clear they hate you, the average person, and these shit bags should be fed to dogs as they are seditious enemy combatants.
Most are just fooled into thinking they are doing something good. Most of the direct action operators legitimately believe in doing good, but are gullible enough to think their leaders are somewhat honest.
Some are genuinely good guys and they never see a shady task.
A DSS guy asked me what I do when I get an obviously dirty client that I have no choice to work for. I told him I do an amazing job for them, appear to be great friends, ponder who hates them, then reveal them to their enemy. So, for you good guys, out there, reveal the bad guys to other bad guys surreptitiously and create small faction wars. It's like SWATting, but you tell rival cartels.
He actually took my advice, once, and it caused a small hiccup of international chaos. It was great. What do you do when your assignment insists you smuggle gold out of a small foreign country? Tell the paramilitary forces of his neighboring country how to find it. Nothing like a visit from the Tonton Macoute in the middle of the night to raise the blood pressure.
CIA guys aren't a type, I've found. They are all kinds of things from all kinds of backgrounds.
FBI guys are mostly SJW zombies at the bottom, closet faggots throughout, a bunch of perverts, and their leadership are CIA.
DHS is 99% sleeping bureaucrats. Sabotage by bloat. Generally, they're pretty boring people, just milking a bullshit job. Their hands always seem to be tied in the field and their ability to make an impact always seems to be neutered. It's like they're around to babysit contractors, half the time.
The guys I like in DHS are usually former military and are usually operating under multiple directives.
Special operators, in any of these agencies, are usually elitist dicks. While I can work well with any of them and their skills are on point, (I respect what they can do in a group with some long guns) they often can't get over themselves long enough to have a beer with average people.
The low tier teams are really bad about this. SEALS are especially egotistical and the opposite of humble and aren't usually fun to hang out with, especially one on one. In fact, low tier team guys will often start fights in bars and shit just because.
You ever hear about AF 22nd guys? No, because they aren't putting themselves out there to be media darlings of the special forces. AF 22nd guys don't have Facebook accounts and SEALs are all over social media especially dating sites, despite being taught proper op sec.
The tier 1 operators are usually tempered enough not to be blatant dicks, but a tier 1 operator... especially one from leadership... they're a special breed. These are my favorite people to work with because they get results without extra bullshit.
What happens, at different stages, is you begin to work in environments where there are progressively less and less rules. Unfortunately, a lot of people can't keep their moral compass intact when in a situation with no rules.
The field is a great divider and I think few people who are smart and awake can make it to the top without being corrupted. The uncorruptable are usually excluded or given busy work.
However, the ruling class needs level headed guys who can hit heavy with no drama. The ruling class needs results and the literal faggots and SJWs are simply not capable of deploying to a remote location in a harsh environment. Not even for a couple of days.
Just look at the softies in charge. You think, at any stage in his life, Jim Comey could deploy to a random desert on a moment's notice, set up sensitive equipment while hiding and defending against locals? Biden? Bush? Trump? Think any political leader in the US could do it? Brennan? Clapper?
No, not at any stage in their life could they do the shit they require their peons to do. They do not deserve to be in charge if they cannot produce satisfactory results.
Just look at the softies in charge. You think, at any stage in his life, Jim Comey could deploy to a random desert on a moment's notice, set up sensitive equipment while hiding and defending against locals? Biden? Bush? Trump? Think any political leader in the US could do it? Brennan? Clapper?
I think that most elements of the USA have a leadership crisis.
The uncorruptable are usually excluded or given busy work.
And while not in government, I've see the dynamics of organizations and how, once corruption establishes itself, the crooks invest heavily in keeping intelligent / ethical people out to avoid being thrown out themselves or exposed. I think this filtering process like you mentioned is a major problem with organizing people over time that needs a compensation mechanism.
One element of CIA operations was supposed to be just that at one time I think, the placement of operatives into major organizations of every type. And the rationale warped into accepting or encouraging corruption since it gave the CIA more leverage over the organization that could be used at a later time. The end result, the normalization of corruption that after being established in society, normalized within the CIA itself.
Some of the older writings of the CIA are so clear and benevolent, but clearly, given the state we as a country are in today, something went seriously wrong.
Zero trust policies are the answer and we have had the tech for it since the Pentium 286.
Organizations need to be transparent to other organizations and the public for checks and balances and blockchain technology is able to keep a reliable ledger of voting, finances, and even decision trees.
That apparatus used by the government to spy on the citizenry? It needs to be turned around and aimed at politicians and bureaucrats.
There needs to be a time release on documents, which could easily be managed by blockchain. 50 years is enough to keep something locked down. There is no good reason to keep something secret past 100 years.
The secrecy apparatus eliminated the ability for the people to interject and vote on solutions to make better policy.
Policy is now determined by seditious enemy combatamts.
There is no good reason to keep something secret past 100 years.
I don't know about that. Countries can hold grudges for things that happened a century ago. A century is really just a blink of an eye.
I don't know if transparency is the answer since it can sometimes remove autonomy from an organization, especially in an environment of soft terrorism like the USA where Jews and a few other groups terrorize people and try to destroy their lives to the fullest extent the law will allow for doing something they don't want.
One of the things that crippled White Nationalism the most was a kind of transparency where other groups were allowed to participating in decision making, making it so Whites could not advance their own interests without attracting the attention of a group like the Jews. Of course that problem stops when Whites decide to pursue the same soft terrorism tactics they do.
(post is archived)