Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

950

My wife received an "official email" from her employer stating that vaccinated employees no longer have to do all the Covid theatre with the masks, temp checks, questionnaires, etc. Non-vaccinated employees, such as my wife, however, are still treated as "unclean ones", and must continue to do all of the above. Which has the result of her being singled out by her coworkers as an "anti-vaxxer", etc. It's also, I'm quite sure, a precursor into their next step; making the jab mandatory for employment.
I'm not trying to get multiple posts about how she needs to "stop being a cuck" and throw away her mask, etc; I'm wanting to know just how actually legal/illegal it is for an employer to incentivize getting a non-FDA medical treatment like this, and what, if anything, she can do, legally speaking, to fight back without losing her job in the process.

Edit for clarification, because some of these answers are for a slightly different question: She is technically not being required to get the jab (yet); she's just being forced to wear an article of clothing, etc, that other employees are not, based solely on her personal health decisions. Someone below even said their employer offered $1K to incentivize employees to get [this still very much non-FDA approved, "emergency use only" treatment]. Wow, that's a bad thing to be in any way legal.

My wife received an "official email" from her employer stating that vaccinated employees no longer have to do all the Covid theatre with the masks, temp checks, questionnaires, etc. Non-vaccinated employees, such as my wife, however, are still treated as "unclean ones", and must continue to do all of the above. Which has the result of her being singled out by her coworkers as an "anti-vaxxer", etc. It's also, I'm quite sure, a precursor into their next step; making the jab mandatory for employment. I'm not trying to get multiple posts about how she needs to "stop being a cuck" and throw away her mask, etc; I'm wanting to know just how *actually* legal/illegal it is for an employer to incentivize getting a non-FDA medical treatment like this, and what, if anything, she can do, legally speaking, to fight back without losing her job in the process. Edit for clarification, because some of these answers are for a slightly different question: She is technically not being *required* to get the jab (yet); she's just being forced to wear an article of clothing, etc, that other employees are not, based solely on her personal health decisions. Someone below even said *their* employer offered $1K to incentivize employees to get [this still very much non-FDA approved, "emergency use only" treatment]. Wow, that's a bad thing to be in any way legal.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (198).
[–] • 33 pts (edited )

I'd advise she contact a lawyer who specializes in EEOC cases at the very least. I can point you to a few helpful articles - such as this one (lifesitenews.com) but there's no substitute for actual legal advice.

My brother-in-law works at a company where just such behavior was happening. One employee had their lawyer contact the company CEO and VP of HR and all the harassment stopped.

Edit: In another comment I made I shared a post related to a woman sent home from work by Target. I dug into the firm mentioned in that article and found their legal intake form (americasfrontlinedoctors.org) for use by those seeking legal assistance. I have no idea whether the firm is any good, but it might help to speak with them.

[–] • 22 pts

My wife works in talent acquisition. She knows how "the game" is played. Employees like that will eventually be terminated. Everyone will know the real reason why, but the reason given will be something very petty like, "They were late to work twice last year and there have been anonymous complaints that they used vulgar language once."

[–] • 11 pts

Employees who don't bend will be forced out or made uncomfortable enough to leave on their own. I agree with you there. The employees you need to worry about are the ones who have proven to you that they will involve a lawyer. Lawsuits are a pain in the arse for companies to resolve.

[–] • 8 pts (edited )

Especially when they involve something like 100s of thousands of doctors, scientists and others are publically crying out for. They are screaming at people, "this is an EXPERIMENT! Do not inject yourself with an unknown toxic chemical! If you're still here after a year and change you're already immune!!"

[–] • 2 pts

If it's an at will state no reason will be given if the company is smart.

[–] • 0 pt

"You're being fired for 'cause'."

Why?

"Just cause."

So no specific cause?

"For many different reasons but no specific one."

[–] • 0 pt

You can't get fired for yelling fuck at the top of your lungs. Like they literally can't fire you for talking.

[–] • 9 pts

I have to believe that is the beginning of the end. I was written up twice in one day over how I parked at work- the 3rd write up in 30 days apparently is grounds for termination. They have all the power.

[–] • 5 pts

Hopefully you are already looking for another job. I would have started at the first write up.

[–] • 3 pts

Can you reveal the company name? We need a place to post these Communist employers.

[–] • 3 pts

How is that related at all to communism? I see a lot of people throwing this accusation around lately and I am genuinely curious as to why you are attributing it to that.

[–] • 1 pt

Hmm, explains why so many folks 'go postal' at their former places of employment

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

Document EVERYTHING.

Especially any & all correspondence from her work/bosses/owners/managers, official and not-so official, and have her take another look at her official employee handbook (to see if it has been changed and/or updated).

If she starts now with making copies of all of these things, plus her written account of things that are occurring that aren’t listed in the official emails, texts, handbook,...etc., (a daily handwritten log book) she’ll have even more of a slam dunk case when her employers go full-woke and she gets an attorney.

If’s the rare person who documents these things, which is why when it’s evidence in court it will look even better for her case.

She should obviously keep this to herself and don’t let on she’s protecting herself.

In times like these, a “great friend” at work could burn you down if they thought it would save their job.

[–] • 0 pt

This is the best advice so far.