Honestly, bsd is what that person would use.
Any linux distro with systemd is compromised.
Compromised in what way?
And where could I find a simpleton's version of BSD?
The init process is now very complex and convoluted. It runs software which is easy to insert bugs and obfuscate. Systemd provides no advantages, has many disadvantages, is a security nightmare and bug haven, providing an extremely wide attack surface. It was rabidly promoted for absolutely no reason. All opposed were viciously attacked across all platforms.
Things like this don't happen unless the intelligence community wants it. Prior to systemd, they used physical hardware to spy on linux users. For some reason they don't do that anymore. What a coincidence.
I've been looking at BSD for some time. What do you think about (based off freeBSD)? I've heard there are forks of BSD that are fucked same as linux, but I don't know much more than that.
There are two main forks of BSD. One is considered more secure than Linux. The other is considered extremely secure.
I've not played with BSD in a number of years and have no opinion on TrueOS.
I can tell you for sure that if you want integrity, you're looking at some form of BSD.
As a side note, I know there exists some level of linix binary compatibility on BSD. I've never played with it and I don't know the full implications of it. But at least you have application options should you desire.
(post is archived)