Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

417

My understanding is this is jewish banks hedging risk in lending to poor people, but the spin is White America is racist to blacks because muh redlining.

Thanks for any and all input!

My understanding is this is jewish banks hedging risk in lending to poor people, but the spin is White America is racist to blacks because muh redlining. Thanks for any and all input!

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

Get serious, it is a huge risk lending to niggers any way you look at it. Going purely by the numbers it's clear.

[–] • 0 pt

The government is forcing them to do nigger loans again. This time they might not be able to bundle it up as some mystery garbage for suckers to invest in. I'm not sure. Anyway, there's going to be another crash based on this nigger loan shit.

[–] • 0 pt

I agree but I’m arguing my liberal friends on this and this is their example of systemic racism

Working to say it was designed against poor people and not black

Appreciate the comment

[–] • 1 pt

Swap "racism/sexism" with "meritocratic."

So yes, it was "racist"

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Red lining was used to denote high risk financial areas. It applied equally to white areas too if they had high crime. If you map these areas today they will of course disproportionately highlight low income, high crime areas. Which is majority non-white. But, it is going to cover people who otherwise are credit worthy. Both white and non-white.

Obviously those policies made it easy to abuse. I'm sure it was. Today the real problem is people who are not credit worthy are provided credit and we are all supposed to absorb the hit. Thats equally racist and discriminatory against whites and especially males. As it disproportionately forces white males to pay for non-white and female defaults. Very unfair.

Frankly, in a white country, it's much more fair for non-whites to carry the burden of discrimination than it is for whites to carry the discriminatory burden of guests (non-whites). I would expect the inverse for non- white counties. Which is universally true today. It's only fair the people of that country benefit from their own country. Unreasonable to demand those not of that country unfairly benefit on the backs of those of that country. That is racist and discrimination. Though, of course, we're all indoctrinated to believe thats the definition of fairness - systemic discrimination against whites and especially white males.

[–] • 0 pt

"Affordable housing programs" get renamed "predatory lending" after it all crashes. They're essentially the same thing

[–] • 0 pt

The laws that outlawed "redlining" really just said that you had to do business with black people who you knew were going to screw you.

This is one more reason why killing cops, lawyers, and judges should not be a crime.