Those pieces of paper contain the rule of law upon which enforcement is justified under the law.
And the whole fucking piece of IMPORTANCE was about restricting enforcement.
What are you talking about ... haha!
> Those pieces of paper contain the rule of law upon which enforcement is justified under the law.
And the whole fucking piece of IMPORTANCE was about restricting enforcement.
What are you talking about ... haha!
Where did you read anything about "restricting enforcement"?
The Constitution restricts government. The people must enforce those restrictions. The paper the words are written on isn't going to do it.
Where did you read anything about "restricting enforcement"?
The Constitution restricts government. The people must enforce those restrictions. The paper the words are written on isn't going to do it.
The Constitution restricts government.
You wrote that.
Where did you read anything about "restricting enforcement"?
I wrote this.
Are we now so lame that we are arguing over "enforcement" versus "restricts" ... fuck if I know.
Cheers mate.
E: Actually, you used my same verbiage. LOL
> The Constitution restricts government.
You wrote that.
> Where did you read anything about "restricting enforcement"?
I wrote this.
Are we now so lame that we are arguing over "enforcement" versus "restricts" ... fuck if I know.
Cheers mate.
E: Actually, you used my same verbiage. LOL
(post is archived)