Do you guys have otherwise endearing communist siblings who even in the face of your most calmly delivered evidence will just lie and deflect and still be communist faggots or cunts? Do we just cut them off at this point?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (79).

[–] • 1 pt

(edited )

// EDIT: This is merely an attempt to try and apply analysis, your post spurred an interesting thought.

Well ...

1) You are observing a feature of the human animal. This is built into everyone.

2) One way to look at humans is as a psychological athlete with a list of skills and specialties they have practiced to become experts at. So, every human has a table of skills:

Skill 1 - Rating #
Skill 2 - Rating #
Skill 3 - Rating #
Skill 4 - Rating #
Skill 5 - Rating #

3) Once you can lookup the rating scorecard for each humans skillstack, you can categorize people. Some will be good are more things than others, some will only be good at only one skill and terrible at everything else, etc.

Now we can start talkign about the particular skill involved in conservation of belief / maliability of beleif of any single psychological athlete. We should be able to test for this.

If you have any experience with different ethnic groups that have in group preference, you will notice that each of them can be rated as more or less maliable. Most groups can be moved one way or the other with different levels energy input, but there are only two groups of humans that are absolutely immovable in their beleif systems:

a) Serious cult members.

b) Muslims.

While there are a tiny number of mulsim apostates, the reality is that there is no amount of energy that can move muslims against their beleif in islam.

4) Now that we have defined a way to provide metric based analysis of the problem and defined a test that not only categorizes different ethnic groups according to beleif maleability, we now even have a testable hypothesis that predicts that we can identify certain groups that are completly non-maleable.

This leads us to the conclusion that what we call 'normies' are not 'normies' at all but merely lack the skill / skillstack that guarantees lack of maleability.

5) My use of the term normie was inaccurate in a technical sense, I was referring to humans that have a greater skillstack than the average western citizen and these people can only be found here. Once you recognize that our people have a larger skillstack it becomes difficult to have a conversation with your definition of a normie because you start to recognize that they don't have the cognitive skillset necessary to comprehend what you are saying.

If I were to apply normie to a technical analysis above, it is clear that the average western citizen is easily maleable becasue they don't have the same skillstack that muslims have in order to prevent beleif maleability.

The more analysis that is applied to this particula problem, the easier it is to see that our people can be skilled up to a point where this is not a problem.

What is required the right set of frameworks to implement the training.

We won't get everyone at once, it is a slow row at first, but it is already happening.

I know what you are getting at though.

// EDIT: This is merely an attempt to try and apply analysis, your post spurred an interesting thought. Well ... 1) You are observing a feature of the human animal. This is built into everyone. 2) One way to look at humans is as a psychological athlete with a list of skills and specialties they have practiced to become experts at. So, every human has a table of skills: * Skill 1 - Rating # * Skill 2 - Rating # * Skill 3 - Rating # * Skill 4 - Rating # * Skill 5 - Rating # 3) Once you can lookup the rating scorecard for each humans skillstack, you can categorize people. Some will be good are more things than others, some will only be good at only one skill and terrible at everything else, etc. Now we can start talkign about the particular skill involved in conservation of belief / maliability of beleif of any single psychological athlete. We should be able to test for this. If you have any experience with different ethnic groups that have in group preference, you will notice that each of them can be rated as more or less maliable. Most groups can be moved one way or the other with different levels energy input, but there are only two groups of humans that are absolutely immovable in their beleif systems: a) Serious cult members. b) Muslims. While there are a tiny number of mulsim apostates, the reality is that there is no amount of energy that can move muslims against their beleif in islam. 4) Now that we have defined a way to provide metric based analysis of the problem and defined a test that not only categorizes different ethnic groups according to beleif maleability, we now even have a testable hypothesis that predicts that we can identify certain groups that are completly non-maleable. This leads us to the conclusion that what we call 'normies' are not 'normies' at all but merely lack the skill / skillstack that guarantees lack of maleability. 5) My use of the term normie was inaccurate in a technical sense, I was referring to humans that have a greater skillstack than the average western citizen and these people can only be found here. Once you recognize that our people have a larger skillstack it becomes difficult to have a conversation with your definition of a normie because you start to recognize that they don't have the cognitive skillset necessary to comprehend what you are saying. If I were to apply normie to a technical analysis above, it is clear that the average western citizen is easily maleable becasue they don't have the same skillstack that muslims have in order to prevent beleif maleability. The more analysis that is applied to this particula problem, the easier it is to see that our people can be skilled up to a point where this is not a problem. What is required the right set of frameworks to implement the training. We won't get everyone at once, it is a slow row at first, but it is already happening. I know what you are getting at though.

parent
link