Let me guess. You call everything bitcoin and you bought doge on Robin hood.
tO tHe MoOoOoOn!
Mate XRP has trapped you all. You made fuck all gains from XRP while the market exploded. You and my brother and my brother in law all missed out on massive gains because you bought the xrp nonsense.
There is almost 100billion XRP in circulation. You think it can get to 10k. Hilarious. It's market cap would be more than all the money in the entire world economy.
Jesus Christ, vechain has less tokens in circulation and their community is pushing for $1 vechain. Not 10 or 100. $1.
10k 😂😂
XRP is nothing more than a distraction from the real movers.
I hold a little but you maximalists are lost causes.
I have over 200 different coins. From tiny art altcoins I like the whitepapers on to larger developments backed by investors to the big 3. How have you missed big money being in xrp? By it going up in price 7 times over? Vet and tel are doing fine. Dot is doing fine. Canon is one that may do very well. None of those will be the next global international money mover. Xrp will.
Xlm will be adopted by bric. Xrp will be adopted by imf. These things aren't mutually exclusive.
It went up 7 times while vet and many others went up 100x.
Myself my brother and brother in law all went in with about 12k.
They were xrp maximalists. They are up to around 50k. Having tried to trade a little. Even if they didn't they would be up to 70k.
I'm up to 480k. And it would be a lot more if I had just hodled.
From the same starting point.
So they lost out big time wouldn't you agree.
Serious question. Why do I keep hearing about NFTs now? Aren't NFTs basically like the crypto equivalent of skins?
Nft is a non fungible token. Basically it's a unique item.
You and I both have a tron token. They are worth the same, they are unique in the idea that the one you have is yours and mine is mine, but I'd we traded we would still both have one trx. They are fungible. All the same.
Now let's say you have an nft and I have an nft. Mine and yours are not the same thing and are not worth the same thing necessarily. They can represent ownership of a physical or digital item or be a unique item in a game built on blockchain.
They have their place and are a cool concept but the nft craze right now is a fad. Once it hypes down there will be real use and innovation around it
I guess the part I really don't get is how people are speculating on them? The buzz around NFTs reminds me of how gold was being hocked before it shot up in price. But like you said, NFTs are unique. It's not like you go to an exchange and buy an "NFT" like you would eth or whatever.
I am somewhat familiar with NFT trading as far as like their value as a collectible from certain games and whatnot, but I am really confused because they are being discussed like a general commodity? My mental picture of it is like baseball cards, but the card's value is based on the popularity of the player..so in that sense, it kind of seems like if Apple or whoever creates an NFT, I should just grab as many as I can...For short term gains, not as a way to store value.
Or am I just totally off base and simultaneously showing my age?
It's like owning the digital code of a piece of art, file, text, etc.
Some are taking off being seen as collectibles like Pokémon cards. E.g. nbatopshots sells gif-like cards of NBA players.
It has potentional but can be kind of stupid as you just literally view whatever you have and everyone else can view it but you own it.
Right now half of nfts seem to be money laundering and such.
And I do see it having a worth in the future for virtual reality games.
(post is archived)