A 100x magnification is just good enough to tell the ISS is man made, the ISS is 250+ miles above earth, the moon is ~238,900 miles away. Here's an article on the subject explaining why even hubble can't really see anything: https://skyandtelescope.org/observing/how-to-see-all-six-apollo-moon-landing-sites/ Tldr: hubble could see something 300 feet wide on the moon the widest thing is under 20 foot wide, but the lunar orbiter can see the landing sites, foot paths, and modules. The questions about the moon landing you should be asking are in the historical development of rocketry. Is modern rocketry plausible without werner von braun and the moon missions? Are GPS and corporate investment in space plausible without those events? Think about the cost of the war in afghanistan and compare that with the investments needed for asteroid capture and you will grasp why there is so much international and corporate interest in space now. Optics are limited by distance and focal length, those deep space gas clouds hubble is famous for spotting are light years across, the nearest solar system is about 4 light years away, closer than the distance edge to edge of the pillars of creation and they are just an interesting section of a nebula spanning some 55 light years. Scale in space is easy to misjudge, to laymen orbit just means orbit.