WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

300

Are these people an offshoot of flat earthers?

Are these people an offshoot of flat earthers?

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 23 pts (edited )

Probably jews trying to take away and discredit the greatest human feat of all time performed by white america and masterminded by nazi scientists, their worst nightmares.

[–] 8 pts (edited )

But remember, it was the black women at NASA who did everything noteworthy there. /s/

[–] 4 pts

The logic that believing individuals from both the lowest IQ race and the least logical sex are responsible for the complex calculations behind the moon landing is just baffling.

[–] 4 pts

If you think we went to the fucking moon with 1969 technology and did it 6 times in 6 fucking years you are a God damn fucking idiot.

Do 10 minutes of research! Get a fucking brain! When you find it use it 5o think critically! Go watch the video of the guys leaving the moon and ask your self who is filming it go up from the surface who is down there filming them taking off?

[–] [deleted] 8 pts

The 1960s is decades ago, but they weren't technologically retarded. Computer technology existed at the time. The precursor to the internet was created. They invented the laser, and LED lighting. Lots of things we still use today came from the 1960s. America was way ahead of everyone.

[–] 2 pts

Name something else that 50 years later it is basically impossible instead of a million times easier.. it would be like 50 years after the model t was made cars where worse

[–] 0 pt

One of the reasons the usa had to split from gold was because it threw so much money at the space program it raped the supply.

Why haven't we gone back to space

Because that shit is expensive for 0 gain.

[–] 6 pts (edited )

At this point in time, I will listen to anyone on this topic, including those of you that don't believe it.

1) The more I look into it, the more my mind is blown by so many pieces of the event:

  • Two or three guys landed on the moon in a vehicle SUCCESSFULLY (I don't remember the specific numbers of a typical crew size)

  • Two guys got out, walked around for a bit, they were on the moon for 22 hours.

  • Two guys get back into this vehicle.

  • The missile system had not only enough fuel to get them to the moon AND LAND, the lander had enough fuel to TAKE OFF AGAIN.

... what? ...

  • Ever see the size of the returning capsule in any of the space museums? How did these two or three guys shit?

  • Did the astronauts wear those suits all the way there? How would they suit up / suit down if not? If they did have the suits on all the way there, how did they shit? If they had suits on for 5 days (armstrongs length of the trip), did they shit for 5 days in the same suit?

  • If they did not shit in the suits, how did they take the suits off to shit and put them back on?

  • The two or three guys had enough food AND WATER WITH THEM to survive getting to the moon, landing on the moon, walking around on the moon, getting back in to the lander, take off with the lander, get back to the earth in the take off part of the lander, successfully land in the ocean.

2) I have been to the various museums with the capsules and various replicas of vehicles including the moon buggy. I have no idea how any of it was possible. I can only imagine any of this happening if the astronauts were like 6 inches tall because I have no idea how anyone takes enough food, water, air and survive in such tiny spaces for 5 days which is how long armstrongs to the moon and back took.

3) All of the above are just technical questions. I can imagine all of those can be engineered out. But, what really gets me is that a lot of the photography, video and media seems fucking fake.

Here is the really big part that I do not understand: Not only did thy manage to carry enough food, water and oxygen with them to LAST FOR 5 DAYS INCLUDING HAVING ENOUGH TO LAND ON THE MOON AND TAKE OFF WITH IT AS WELL .... HOW THE FUCK DID THEY BROADCAST LIVE VIDEO BACK TO THE EARTH?

Just what kind of fucking broadcasting equipment can you take with you to the moon in 1969, TAKE IT OUT OF THAT TINY CAPSULE, MOUNT IT ON THE MOON, FILM A BUNCH OF SHIT AND ACTUALLY BROADCAST LIVE BACK TO THE EARTH?

Just what kind of MAGIC FUCKING BATTERY DID THEY HAVE IN 1969 TO POWER THIS SHIT?

Ever carry around a car battery? Ever try to see how long they last before they drain to nearly useless?

Just how much power do you need to be able to film the landing capsule and broadcast this back to earth:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sj6a0Wrrh1g

Whaaaaaaat? How are they controlling the focus and following the lander? They had remote control for the camera in 1969?

Also, HOW DO YOU FOCUS A FUCKING CAMERA ON THE MOON WHEN YOU ARE WRAPPED IN A GIANT SIZED SPACE SUIT?

How the fuck does that work? The focus on that camera is PERFECT. 1969 cameras did not have LCD displays, autofocus, sensors, anything. It was a physical lens gathering light.

4) Watch the video again. Look at the size. Take a look at photos of the size of the astronauts in the suits relative to those landers.

Was the lander part presurized? If so how can they have enough air with them to have a presurized cabin DEPRESSURIZE THE CABIN, OPEN THE DOOR AND GET OUT?

And then ... OPEN THE DOOR AND GET BACK IN AND PRESSURIZE THE CABIN AGAIN?

Whaaaaaaaaaaat?

Ever see the size of scuba tanks? How THE FUCK do you carry enough air with you to pressurize that capsule, depressurize it, get out walk around, re-pressurize it AND THEN TAKE OFF?

Just WHERE THE FUCK IS THE POWER FOR ALL OF THAT COMING FROM? How big are the fucking batteries to power everything on that capuse AND ACTUALLY DE-PRESSURIZE / REPRESSURIZE THE CABIN in the lander vehicle?

5) And of course the other problem now is that this is 2021 and we have the internet. We always knew the government and media lied to us, but it kind of seemed distant like a fairy tale. These days, we now KNOW that the government now lies to us non stop, is involved in behaviour manipulation and modification campaigns, has put white people as top terrorsist threat, kills people outright on a whim ... and so on.

Now we know just how far this faggots will go to lie, cheat, steal and manipulate.

I no longer trust any source of information ESPECIALLY if it comes from the government or any organization that seems to have authority that prevents it from being examined and questioned.

Did the government use the moon landings as propaganda? Yes.

I have zero doubt that a whole bunch of fucking media was created and used for propaganda purposes.

If the moon landings happened, they kind of poisoned the well in my opinion.

5) Oh, and that camera and that lander pad in the video above? Those are still on the moon.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Bruh, please, play some fucking KSP and stop embarrassing yourself in public. I appreciate you asking questions, just try to make them less retarded next time.

https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/fuel-cell-apollo/nasm_A19730934000

[–] 0 pt

Agree 100%

Sure keep believeing that fucking fairy tale.. we went to the moon with less computing power then a fucking walmart wrist watch.

Also the moonlanding story is fucking hillarious.

Every ounce of weight mattered on the original moooon landings. Yet they took a fucking dunemoonbuggy and a golf club!! Lol

They did a live broadcast with a phone call to the president on live tv with almost no delay perfect worked perfect

They went through the van allen radiation belts in a tin and aluminum hull! Lol and 3 different nasa astrounaghts recently said we dont have the technology to get through the van allen belts now one said we would need 5 foot thick lead shield.

Not one picture from the moon or the flight that shows stars for some reason.

The greatesr human achievment and nasa recorded over the telemtry data! Sure right good one lol.

Almost no clear goos pictures of the earth from the moon and not one picture of an astronaught with the earth in the back ground

One timeline with modern technology said 20 years to get to the moon in 1969 they did it faster i guess they had really good tech back then! Lol

The rock buzz aldrin gave to a museum in holland was petrified wood. Lol!

In the interview after they got back one astrobaught said i dont remember seeing any stars! Lol go out and lokk at the sky u will see stars now imagine being on the moon with no atmospher and saying you couldnt see stars

They fucking way they talk during their time on the moon sounds more like guys going to the beach not guys 290,000 miles from earth in the vacum of space where any tiny mistep is certain death. Go back and listen and realise there is no fucking way they should be that gib and relaxed.

Im sure there is more but those 10 things should at least make you raise your eyebrows and think maybe something is not right

[–] 5 pts

You mean the lunar rover they took with them that has a camera on it that can be programmed and operated from earth?

Let me guess the earth is flat too?

[–] 3 pts

The Earth looks pretty flat from space. Shame the camera angle didn't show the elephants and the giant turtle.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah because the soviets are fucking stupid or were in on it. NASA had such huge balls they didn't just fake it once to win the space race, they did it another 5 times!

You are fucking deadset retarded if you believe the moon landings were faked.

[–] 3 pts

Some soviet scientist were pretty fucking smart. In many respects, their space program was ahead of ours.

[–] 1 pt

they did it another 5 times

Yeah, they had to go back to the moon 5 times to play golf and drive a stupid buggy for no reason but they never bothered to take a picture of stars or verify the previous landing sites.

What an idiot.

[–] 1 pt

I read this and thought you must be a former "little bus rider" but then it hit me - American education is so fucked now that tasks that require advanced math/science seem to be magic -- or at minimum, seem impossible to most Americans under age 50.

Earth to moon distance is approximately 10x circumference of earth - it's not that far away. Orbital calculations can easily be accomplished using simple computers + intelligent humans. Combine those with digital timing, rocket science, and a vacuum proof container and it's nowhere near impossible. The technology is easily repeatable, but because almost all aspects of space flight require edge-of-human-endurance combined with edge-of-structural-endurance the danger to humans hasn't decreased with advances in technology.

What's "impossible" is expecting a military-industrial complex poisoned by decades of easy money, or the current open market to take on a task that would not allow cost overrides or provide sufficient stakeholder returns to justify taking it on.

As for the videos, you do understand that satellite communications and cameras existed in the 1960's? And that cameras were built into vantage points within the space capsule as well as carried by astronauts?

[–] 0 pt

Your concern trolling to start is funny. I mean poor you little stupid person you do not have the intellectual capacity to understand that we had rockets and could do math in 1969.

Well thanks for helping me understand ohhh super brain.

Shut the fuck up you condescending fucking bitch.

Van allen radiation belts we went through those in in fucking pressurized tin can! We took a moon buggy too! It is so fucking stupid it's beyond belief when you actually look at what suppodly happend.

No we did not go to the moon period do some research and try to use common sense the problem is this. Your world is based on lies massive fucking lies and you will not let them go you equate the lies to your reality and if you admit the moon shit was total bullshit then you have to admit you were wrong.

It's easier to fol someone then to convince them they have been fooled.

Look I feel bad for you. You seem like a smart guy but how can you expect to defeat the billions of dollars (((they))) spent educating you<<< well brainwashing you actually. Sorry you can't see it keep taking that blue pill buddy every thing is great when you believe the lies it makes life a lot easier.

[–] 0 pt

If you think we went to the fucking moon with 1969 technology

It is just a ballistics problem, which is fairly basic physics. It's not rocket science!

[–] 2 pts

Hahahhahah. How is this upvoted here? Lol, going to the moon. Hahaha

[–] 2 pts

If you see these stupid faggots, kikes, and glow niggers you can blow out their assholes with the ISS.

The ISS can be seen high in the sky for half the year and low on the horizon on the other days, all intermittently.

You just need a 100x telescope to see the solar panels on the ISS and you can find such a telescope for 50 bucks.

Also moon landing was real, soviets would have had decades of propaganda disproving the landing if it could be disproven.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts (edited )

They'll just tell you it's a flying pancake, that's if they can even use a telescope at all. Sometimes people go just a bit too far down the rabbit hole and the traumatism of what they learn makes them doubt every single thing they ever learned, especially those people with no science-related background.

[–] 2 pts

They lost all the technology and all drawings and schematics..HAHAHAHAHAHA. People will believe everything

[–] 1 pt

So you should be able to see all the things we left on the moon with a 1000 dollar telescope then right? But you can’t..Why? Because it’s not there.

[–] 0 pt

A 100x magnification is just good enough to tell the ISS is man made, the ISS is 250+ miles above earth, the moon is ~238,900 miles away.

Here's an article on the subject explaining why even hubble can't really see anything: https://skyandtelescope.org/observing/how-to-see-all-six-apollo-moon-landing-sites/

Tldr: hubble could see something 300 feet wide on the moon the widest thing is under 20 foot wide, but the lunar orbiter can see the landing sites, foot paths, and modules.

The questions about the moon landing you should be asking are in the historical development of rocketry. Is modern rocketry plausible without werner von braun and the moon missions? Are GPS and corporate investment in space plausible without those events?

Think about the cost of the war in afghanistan and compare that with the investments needed for asteroid capture and you will grasp why there is so much international and corporate interest in space now.

Optics are limited by distance and focal length, those deep space gas clouds hubble is famous for spotting are light years across, the nearest solar system is about 4 light years away, closer than the distance edge to edge of the pillars of creation and they are just an interesting section of a nebula spanning some 55 light years.

Scale in space is easy to misjudge, to laymen orbit just means orbit.

[–] 0 pt

if it could be disproven

It can’t.

and the USSR was in on it as well. ALL space missions are fake. The Cold War was fake and gay as well. The “Space Race” was part of that.

[–] 0 pt

How embarrassing to view obviously, comically fake hoaxes as a point of ethnic pride.

[–] 0 pt

When people say space is fake they don't mean it literally. It's a simple tactic employed for us to completely discredit the scientifiic establishment , so when the time comes, intellectuals blurring the lines like you won't hesitate to separate and denounce them when needed because of your white empathy, which is a weakness.

We're simply reawakening your tribal instincts and drawing the line in the sand against the Other, which you persist on fighting.

So yes, space is fake, fool.

Awwwww yeeeaaaahhhh!!!! Gotcha ya fucking cunt.

[–] 11 pts

Either they’re retards or they’re kikes trying to muddy the waters. This is just like how “conspiracy theories” were back in the golden age of the internet: you’d see shit about lizard people, flat earth, Illuminati, etc. mixed in with legitimate information.

The end goal was to create a precedent for low-iq retards to say “what? You’re not one of those conspiracy theory people, are you? Lol, look out! Lizard people! Haha.”

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

This this right here I often think that after the invention of the microscope and the study of the world, they've been struggling to inject themselves into a point where they can take control

However, you could do 99% of th experiments yourself to prove most of the uniervsal laws, so they couldn't lie about that

So what did they lie about? The aether ;) it's never been disproven, just our motion through the ether was disproven. The ether would explain so many "unexplainable" bullshit in the higher order physics where I suspect that Einstein hid the truth and yeah, wtfff

[–] 0 pt

They would never engineer a massive deception to completely censor vast areas of the known world (known to them; unknown to us of course). Massive propaganda fueled fake science based trickery is just not apart of their MO; nope there is just no precedent for a multi-century cult intent on exploiting the human populace by means of deception and chaos; while burying & censoring knowledge & our true origin and place in this world. That malarky is total lizard level conspiracy! Whew I'm so glad you are helping to point out the tinfoil hatters. You are doing G's work, hail baphomet brother !

[–] 0 pt

That we live on a flat plane is sooooo lizard people level conspiracy right? They would never lie to us !

Now back to believing Neil Tyson Degrasse that we are orbiting the sun at 66,600 MPH goy

https://www.livescience.com/32294-how-fast-does-earth-move.html

[–] [deleted] 8 pts

You're in a train's dining car and the acceleration is keeping it at a steady 60MPH. Why isn't the water in the glass on the table tilting to front or back? Your homework assignment is to look up and study the term "inertial frame of reference."

Now it is possible that you are too stupid and innumerate to understand even the most simple aspects of Newtonian physics. After all, you APPEAR to be more than stupid enough to be incapable of absorbing even the most minute amount of data. But I'll give you one shot to try, on the far-fetched assumption that perhaps you actually have some small measure of intellectual curiosity, instead of being what you appear to be, a total niggerbrain.

[–] 2 pts

You're in a train's dining car and the acceleration is keeping it at a steady 60MPH.

If you are traveling at a steady 60 MPH, there is no acceleration, you dumb shit.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I wish I could upvote this ten times! Lolz.

[–] 0 pt

You're living a normal life. You're dining at a table. It's flat, motionless - thus you can eat your food in peace. You look at the sunset over a flat horizon. You notice the moon coming into view, about the same size as the sun.

Along comes a hook nosed creature. He tells you that your table is actually planted on a ball. That the horizon although looks flat, is actually curved. That this ball, although feels motionless, is spinning at 1,000 miles per hour. That the sun and moon, while they appear to be the same size, are 400x times difference and 400x times farther part and despite their similar trajectories overhead that in fact the moon is actually orbiting our ball, and our ball is orbiting the sun. He says our ball is orbiting the sun at 66,600 MPH. And that you must pay your taxes so that his organization may continue to tell you more of these fascinating things you did not know. He tells you he's already gone to the moon and landed there several times but that he has since destroyed the technology, and it's very difficult to build it back.

Your homework assignment is to prove the hooknosed creature's claims.

(if you finish that homework, your next task is to stick water to a spinning ball. No cheating; you can't use CG so you will have to do this experiment in a testable, measurable, repeatble way so that there can be independent verification of your miracle)

Goodluck!

[–] 1 pt (edited )

And the sun is 400x larger than the moon, but also 400x farther away, making it look the same size in the sky. Mainstream science literally calls this a

Space is fake and gay.

[–] 0 pt

Actually those numbers are approximate. is a page with the angular sizes of various celestial objects.

[–] -1 pt (edited )

Getting normies to assess the odds is a promising way to unbrainwash them; like you did here.

You could state it this way; what are the odds the sun is 400x larger than the moon, that it is also 400x father away, making it look the same size in the sky (to ensure perfect alignment in solar eclipse as your link shows) vs the odds a multi-century old Kabala cult decided to invert people's perception of reality by using these fantastical numbers (and setting the Earth at 66,600 MPH orbit as icing on the cake)?

Don't forget to encourage an odds comparison vs extraterrestrial configuration too; ie- a hidden hand who placed things into perfect orbit and arrangement to sustain their ant farm Earth.

Cause the message on that UFO tshirt is legit: "I want to believe" its that people want to believe the fantasies. The challenge is getting people to acknowledge this behavior; this tendency to question why they don't question the fantaies.

Fantasy is more interesting; sexier and more convenient a way to unload the burden of the 'miracle of us' to 'another'. Instead of coming to grips that the explanation need not be complex: that our ecosystem is small and local; our unique existence does not require aliens nor the hand of god to bring us about - since the blood in our veins is a life giving force in of itself; our bodies are a form of natural engineering intended to protect and procreate said life force and the greater ecosystem is here to sustain those bodies idealy in harmony with every other living body too (including parasites which can destroy enough of us to inspire a correction to the self-destructive behavior; thriving today in our world as so many feed them their mind and wasted blood through conflict & fantasy belief and the resulting toxic patterns hastening death).

I for one am inspired. The ecosystem is working, we are not flawed but can be troubled at times but that too is apart of the design: life is a strugggle; struggle requires work, participation and energy which exerts into the feedback loop that returns us with more life. It's why (((they))) will never go away.

He's retarded, but he's not wrong We are moving but we are moving with the system hence we cant tell

[–] 10 pts

Seems like far more shills than normal show up in these kinds of threads. Hmmmm.

[–] 2 pts

Yup, because this is over the target. That's when they flock in.

[–] 1 pt

oy vey, put the tinfoil hat back on, goyim!

[–] 9 pts

It's people who muddy the waters when it comes to people asking legitimate questions about certain aspects of life being fucked up or kiked.

For example, when someone mentions that vaccines can cause problems, you get a whole heap of these "muddy the waters" fuckwits who will hijack that and say "You have to remove toxins from your body with (insert kooky food/method here)".

It's the same as the "space is fake" guys, it's to muddy the waters on discussions of things outside of Earth.

It's all to delegitimise legitimate discussion and to make those people seem as kooky as the nutjob types.

[–] 1 pt

So a health combination of firm sliders and retards?

[+] [deleted] 5 pts
[–] [deleted] 4 pts

They all suck Hans Wormhat's cock during the week, and try to spread his retardation when they're taking a break.

[–] 3 pts

Moon landing truthers that can't understand basic science are some of the funniest poaltards. I would never block any of them.

[–] 3 pts

tl;dr - kike "discredit by association" tactic.

[–] 3 pts

can you prove its real without nasa and your tell-lie-vision?

didnt think so.

space is fake, and gay

if you think we went to the moon, you're a dumbass that probably believes in Q

[–] 5 pts

Step 1: Buy binoculars Step 2: Look up the orbital track of the ISS Step 3: Look at ISS as it passes overhead on a clear night Step 4: Claim binoculars have ISS painted on inside of lens Step 4: Eat binoculars because can am into retard

[–] 1 pt

Yep. Note the lack of argument.

[–] 1 pt

So what ?? , HALO (High Altitude Low-earth Orbit) has been a military 'weather balloon' project since the 50's -just bc there may or may not be a life sized 'container' in earth orbit -says absolutely nothing about the veracity of what they purport 'space' to be ...

There's no answer. I was just watching SpaceX bring up the new new crew last week. So many things happening in that video that couldn't be done except in sustained and I mean, prolonged it I absurdity zero G, WERE YOU to fake it.... Dumb

[–] 1 pt

I had someone argue with me once that orbital mechanics were based on false presumptions so even though the calculations work, theyre not proof of anything in regards to space travel. We share this rock with some very dumb people.

[–] 0 pt

The first 2 lines are jewish aas fuck. The third line is projecting said jewish faggotry onto a simple shitpost line. The 4th line is a true implication in the first half and a pure jewish projection in the second half.

Space is fake cuz wypeepo don't spice they food. Whitey done stole the moon from the Gypshuns.

[–] 3 pts

A fake "conspiracy theory" that was created to label all theories as insane by association!

This was created to make learning about anything other than the official version unsavoury. To put a hurdle between the socially compliant and the truth.

[–] 3 pts

Nope.

space is fake and gay.

IS JUST A FUCKING SHITPOST. That's it. That's all. It's not (((flat Earth))) which IS 100% a jewish piece of propaganda to push onto any community not drinking the kike koolaid. Space is fake and gay is just a fucking shitpost for keks. That's it. Stop reading into it so much.

[–] 0 pt

Telling people to stop looking into something is exactly like saying "look here, not here" therefore your either retarted or a shill.

[–] 2 pts

your either retarted or a shill. your

:)

Also I'm not doing what you're post suggests. I am saying precisely what it is: a fucking shitpost. That's it. Space is fake and gay. There. Done. No meaning behind it.

[–] 3 pts

It's probably more a lack of nuance than anything else. NASA has been repeatedly caught passing off fake pictures and video as real. The video of the moon landing, for example is fake. Does that mean we didn't land on the moon? Not necessarily, but it begs the question of how much is lies? You can no more trust NASA than you can trust a jew, so everything they've ever done comes into question.

However, just because Wendy's has actors holding plastic burgers in their ads that doesn't mean you can't go into Wendy's and buy a real burger from a real worker.

[–] 1 pt

I can get that, to a degree.

[–] 0 pt

The moon landing is clearly fake. It is still up there!

[+] [deleted] 1 pt
Load more (35 replies)