WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

Blacks were freed from slavery because of Christians. The natural order of the superior dominating the inferior was inverted, and the superior was told to submit their superiority so that the black inferiority might be raised to some sort of equal status. This is completely against the law of nature (which you would think has something to do with God), and we see the results of this attempted bastardization everyday. Blacks are not our equal, and we have allowed a foreign animal to run free in our habitat. It has been nothing short of a disaster. Even today the 'law' which has its roots in this same Christian dogma constricts white males from doing what they naturally feel the urge to do, which is to wipe out the blacks like we do with any other pest so that our habitats are pleasant to live in.

I do wonder if Vespasian invented Christianity as a way to subdue the rebellious Jews and manipulate them to send their money flow to Rome, and it instead has backfired on us. We were inexorably expanding until Christianity tore the empire apart. Since then our superiority has still manifested, even under the most submissive of ideologies, in technologies which allowed us to 'settle' the easiest lands in history, but we have never reclaimed north africa, the middle east, not even fucking turkey, despite possessing great power, which any other people would have used to probably win and wipe out the rest of the world by now. We allow subhumans to conquer us because of our 'moral compunctions'.

Blacks were freed from slavery because of Christians. The natural order of the superior dominating the inferior was inverted, and the superior was told to submit their superiority so that the black inferiority might be raised to some sort of equal status. This is completely against the law of nature (which you would think has something to do with God), and we see the results of this attempted bastardization everyday. Blacks are not our equal, and we have allowed a foreign animal to run free in our habitat. It has been nothing short of a disaster. Even today the 'law' which has its roots in this same Christian dogma constricts white males from doing what they naturally feel the urge to do, which is to wipe out the blacks like we do with any other pest so that our habitats are pleasant to live in. I do wonder if Vespasian invented Christianity as a way to subdue the rebellious Jews and manipulate them to send their money flow to Rome, and it instead has backfired on us. We were inexorably expanding until Christianity tore the empire apart. Since then our superiority has still manifested, even under the most submissive of ideologies, in technologies which allowed us to 'settle' the easiest lands in history, but we have never reclaimed north africa, the middle east, not even fucking turkey, despite possessing great power, which any other people would have used to probably win and wipe out the rest of the world by now. We allow subhumans to conquer us because of our 'moral compunctions'.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I honestly question whether niggers have souls. They are so different from us that it is possible that their non-human nature features a lack of a human spirit or soul. This thought especially occurs to me when I see videos of masses of them behaving literally like agitated simians going after each other.

[–] 0 pt

The negroid variety is the lowest, and stands at the foot of the ladder. The animal character, that appears in the shape of the pelvis, is stamped on the negro from birth, and foreshadows his destiny. His intellect will always move within a very narrow circle. He is not however a mere brute, for behind his low receding brow, in the middle of his skull, we can see signs of a powerful energy, however crude its objects. If his mental faculties are dull or even non-existent, he often has an intensity of desire, and so of will, which may be called terrible. Many of his senses, especially taste and smell, are developed to an extent unknown to the other two races.

The very strength of his sensations is the most striking proof of his inferiority. All food is good in his eyes, nothing disgusts or repels him. What he desires is to eat, to eat furiously, and to excess; no carrion2 is too revolting to be swallowed by him. It is the same with odours; his inordinate desires are satisfied with all, however coarse or even horrible. To these qualities may be added an instability and capriciousness3 of feeling, that cannot be tied down to any single object, and which, so far as he is concerned, do away with all distinctions of good and evil. We might even say that the violence with which he pursues the object that has aroused his senses and inflamed his desires is a guarantee of the desires being soon satisfied and the object forgotten. Finally, he is equally careless of his own life and that of others: he kills willingly, for the sake of killing; and this human machine, in whom it is so easy to arouse emotion, shows, in face of suffering, either a monstrous indifference or a cowardice that seeks a voluntary refuge in death.