Which one is the one where aliens fuck the big tittied cave whores?
Which one is the one where aliens fuck the big tittied cave whores?
I am for 'Africans belong in Africa'
I am for 'Africans belong in Africa'
Polygenism obviously....the other is just Abrahamic-based religious crap....or blackie wetdreams. The entire race descending from Adam and Eve via incest on one hand, or skunkapes leaving Africa, turning white (We Wuz Swedes!), on the other.
Polygenism obviously....the other is just Abrahamic-based religious crap....or blackie wetdreams. The entire race descending from Adam and Eve via incest on one hand, or skunkapes leaving Africa, turning white (We Wuz Swedes!), on the other.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzLBkewbWT4
Fuck You!
Fuck You!
If you go far enough back then monogenism is true without extraterrestrial elements for all life on Earth, but in terms of the origins of humanity neanderthal admixture alone proves polygenism quite handily.
Also Out of Africa is politicised nonsense.
If you go far enough back then monogenism is true without extraterrestrial elements for all life on Earth, but in terms of the origins of humanity neanderthal admixture alone proves polygenism quite handily.
Also Out of Africa is politicised nonsense.
Even in the modern "out of Africa" hypothesis, it is accepted that different groups interbred with Neanderthals, Denisovans, etc. that weren't part of the "out of Africa" group. So, as far as I can tell, even the most monogenic scientific view is only partially monogenic, since it only claims that we share some common descent from an original African homo sapien, but not our entire descent.
Regardless, if we were not talking about humans, the debate would be nearly pointless. We are so genetically distant, morphologically different, and tend toward such predictably different social structure and average behavior, that if we were talking about any other organism, we would unquestionably be talking about at least different sub-species. Probably different species, despite the outdated, unscientific, colloquial idea that anyone who can produce fertile offspring are the same species.
In any case, the evidence is strongly against a pure monogenic hypothesis, and there's no conclusive evidence against a polygenic hypothesis. It is purely the cultural zeitgeist which prevents us from honestly considering polygenism.
Even in the modern "out of Africa" hypothesis, it is accepted that different groups interbred with Neanderthals, Denisovans, etc. that weren't part of the "out of Africa" group. So, as far as I can tell, even the most monogenic scientific view is only partially monogenic, since it only claims that we share some common descent from an original African homo sapien, but not our entire descent.
Regardless, if we were not talking about humans, the debate would be nearly pointless. We are so genetically distant, morphologically different, and tend toward such predictably different social structure and average behavior, that if we were talking about any other organism, we would unquestionably be talking about at least different sub-species. Probably different species, despite the outdated, unscientific, colloquial idea that anyone who can produce fertile offspring are the same species.
In any case, the evidence is strongly against a pure monogenic hypothesis, and there's no conclusive evidence against a polygenic hypothesis. It is purely the cultural zeitgeist which prevents us from honestly considering polygenism.
the smart ones migrated and the niggers and apes stayed put.
the smart ones migrated and the niggers and apes stayed put.
(post is archived)