WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

I mean it would fuck you up but you would live. The gorilla trying to stab the other girl would have got blasted but not dead.. protect cops from the soros funded DA s across America

I mean it would fuck you up but you would live. The gorilla trying to stab the other girl would have got blasted but not dead.. protect cops from the soros funded DA s across America

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Non-lethal means non-effective most times.

The problem with a non-lethal shotgun round would be glancing blows, hitting non-critical parts of the body (non-dominant shoulder, for example), etc...

Even with pistol rounds, you need to shoot until blood pressure drops below the consciousness threshold (i.e. there is enough bleeding).

If you need to stop a threat, you need to stop a threat. Not kinda, sorta, maybe try to stop the threat. When someone is trying to stab someone else, you end the threat. Case closed. In a perfect world they live... But, in a perfect world, people wouldn't stab each other with 9-inch blades.

People who talk about non-lethal options have probably never been in a life-threatening situation. (Not taking a shot at you... Just all the people who say things like: "Shoot him in the leg!")

[–] 1 pt

All good I've never been in a shoot out and don't practice shooting enough. I know to aim center mass...

I was thinking a shot gun that basically knocked the fuck out of people but wouldn't kill. Something stronger then a bean bag round?

I think your points are valid btw

[–] 0 pt

Shotguns will kill people, unless you load them with rock salt or some other non-effective pellets. The point is, maybe that non-lethal spray stops the criminal, but maybe it doesn't. And if it doesn't, maybe you are fucked.